Applying object-based image analysis and knowledge-based classification to ADS-40 digital aerial photographs to facilitate complex forest land cover classification

Abstract

In general, considerable human and material resources are required for performing a forest inventory survey. Using remote sensing technologies to save forest inventory costs has thus become an important topic in forest inventory-related studies. Leica ADS-40 digital aerial photographs feature advantages such as high spatial resolution, high radiometric resolution, and a wealth of spectral information. As a result, they have been widely used to perform forest inventories. We classified ADS-40 digital aerial photographs according to the complex forest land cover types listed in the Fourth Forest Resource Survey in an effort to establish a classification method for categorizing ADS-40 digital aerial photographs. Subsequently, we classified the images using the knowledge-based classification method in combination with object-based analysis techniques, decision tree classification techniques, classification parameters such as object texture, shape, and spectral characteristics, a class-based classification method, and geographic information system mapping information. Finally, the results were compared with manually interpreted aerial photographs. Images were classified using a hierarchical classification method comprised of four classification levels (levels 1 to 4). The classification overall accuracy (OA) of levels 1 to 4 is within a range of 64.29% to 98.50%. The final result comparisons showed that the proposed classification method achieved an OA of 78.20% and a kappa coefficient of 0.7597. On the basis of the image classification results, classification errors occurred mostly in images of sunlit crowns because the image values for individual trees varied. Such a variance was caused by the crown structure and the incident angle of the sun. These errors lowered image classification accuracy and warrant further studies. This study corroborates the high feasibility for mapping complex forest land cover types using ADS-40 digital aerial photographs. © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.

Classification of Very High Resolution Aerial Photos Using Spectral-Spatial Convolutional Neural Networks

“…The advantage of using patch-based learning for orthophoto classification is sourced from the benefits of spectral and spatial information of the data that can improve the accuracy compared to just using the individual pixels (only spectral information). To understand this parameter and find its suboptimal value, several experiments were conducted with different patch sizes (n = 3, 5, 7,9,11,13 ). The statistical analysis in terms of model accuracy indicates that using larger n yields higher accuracy ( Figure 8).…”

“…Methods such as object-based image analysis (or OBIA) was mostly investigated because of its advantage in very high-resolution image processing via spectral and spatial features. In a recent paper, Hsieh et al [7] applied aerial photo classification by combining OBIA with decision tree using texture, shape, and spectral feature. Their results achieved an accuracy of 78.20% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.7597.…”

Mapping of land cover with open‐source software and ultra‐high‐resolution imagery acquired with unmanned aerial vehicles

“…However, these segmentation methods tend to be less effective for classifying images with sub-decimeter resolutions and high intra-object spectral variability unless classification results are adjusted manually postprocessing (Pande-Chhetri et al 2017). Object-based segmentation works best when intra-object variability is low and the objects strongly contrast with the background and neighboring objects (Hsieh et al 2017;Kalantar et al 2017).…”

“…Object‐based segmentation works best when intra‐object variability is low and the objects strongly contrast with the background and neighboring objects (Hsieh et al. 2017; Kalantar et al. 2017).…”