2008
DOI: 10.1117/12.770478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying Mojette discrete radon transforms to classical tomographic data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Err of the three different methods as a function of the order of Farey series is plot in Fig.4. We can see that MCS has already got the good reconstruction result with 4 projections, where the Err of Mift and FBP is still larger than 50%. Fig.4 also shows that FBP can gain better results than Mift with the increasing number of projections.…”
Section: A Noise-free Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Err of the three different methods as a function of the order of Farey series is plot in Fig.4. We can see that MCS has already got the good reconstruction result with 4 projections, where the Err of Mift and FBP is still larger than 50%. Fig.4 also shows that FBP can gain better results than Mift with the increasing number of projections.…”
Section: A Noise-free Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A lot of research [4] has been done, committed to applying Mojette transform to classical tomographic data, which implies the advantage of Mojette transform on one hand and improves the potential of Mojette transform in practical application on the other hand. Paper [4] claims that any set of real, acquired tomographic data can be rebinned into a compatible Mojette projection space, without any loss of reconstruction power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MT has been applied to data transmission, encryption and file storage, to reconstruct images from arbitrary sets of projected views of discrete data, and for tomography using real x-ray data [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will discuss how this work can be extended to infer the nature and degree of the noise from the observed data. For the case where there is little noise, non-probabilistic approaches (such as [13] and [6]) are preferable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%