2016
DOI: 10.1152/advan.00138.2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction

Abstract: Faculty members in higher education are involved in many instructional design activities without formal training in learning theories and the science of instruction. Learning theories provide the foundation for the selection of instructional strategies and allow for reliable prediction of their effectiveness. To achieve effective learning outcomes, the science of instruction and instructional design models are used to guide the development of instructional design strategies that elicit appropriate cognitive pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
186
0
15

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(47 reference statements)
5
186
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…It was also recommended to shift the training module to other majors or subjects, such as English education; and finally partially help either directly or indirectly generalize the training module to other multi-ethnic communities under the similar context of Yunnan Province. Thus, future researches may extend the challenge of other training models according to different emphasis in different situations, for instance, one alternative is the Dick and Carey Model, which underlines to provide detailed step-by-step processes especially for novice instructional designers to follow the systematic approach in designing instruction (Dick & Carey, 2005); another alternative is the Kirkpatrick Model, which highlights for analyzing and evaluating the results of training to determine aptitude based on four levels criteria (Reaction, Learning, Behavior, and Results) for both informal and formal styles of training (Khalil & Elkhider, 2016).…”
Section: For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also recommended to shift the training module to other majors or subjects, such as English education; and finally partially help either directly or indirectly generalize the training module to other multi-ethnic communities under the similar context of Yunnan Province. Thus, future researches may extend the challenge of other training models according to different emphasis in different situations, for instance, one alternative is the Dick and Carey Model, which underlines to provide detailed step-by-step processes especially for novice instructional designers to follow the systematic approach in designing instruction (Dick & Carey, 2005); another alternative is the Kirkpatrick Model, which highlights for analyzing and evaluating the results of training to determine aptitude based on four levels criteria (Reaction, Learning, Behavior, and Results) for both informal and formal styles of training (Khalil & Elkhider, 2016).…”
Section: For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is some empirical evidence on the effectiveness of the 4C/ID-model on complex learning training programs such as medicine and dental medicine (Postma & White, 2015Vandewaetere, et al, 2015;Maggio, et al, 2015), and science and informatics (Lim, et al, 2009;van Rosmalen, et al, 2014;Melo & Miranda, 2015;Halil & Elkhider, 2016).…”
Section: Multimedia Learning and The 4c/id-modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To attain effective teaching and learning outcomes, the instructional theories are employed to lead the development of instructional design strategies that produce applicable cognitive processes. The systematic process in the designing of instruction aims to increase instructional efficiency and facilitate students' learning (Khalil & Elkhider, 2016). Instructional design models translate the learning and instruction theory by offering a procedural framework for developing instructional materials and creating an environment for successful learning outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%