2004
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying Habermas’ Validity Claims as a Standard for Critical Discourse Analysis

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because newspapers form the base of our inquiry, the applied method acknowledges the not-neutral and subjective features of the considered texts. There is a notable variety of methods employed in constructive approaches to datasets ranging from content analysis to a family of discourse analysis methods including critical or interpretative discourse analyses and radical humanism (Cukier et al 2004;Wooffitt 2005). These paradigms differ in their conceptualization of the discourse.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because newspapers form the base of our inquiry, the applied method acknowledges the not-neutral and subjective features of the considered texts. There is a notable variety of methods employed in constructive approaches to datasets ranging from content analysis to a family of discourse analysis methods including critical or interpretative discourse analyses and radical humanism (Cukier et al 2004;Wooffitt 2005). These paradigms differ in their conceptualization of the discourse.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the exploratory nature of our research, and based on the need to broadly characterize the phenomenon FinTech, we adhere to the interpretative paradigm. We assume the reality and discourse to be socially constructed and focus on examining the status quo rather than affecting change (Cukier et al 2004). We enrich the analysis by employing tools typical for content analysis such as the identification of central entities and dominating topics in the texts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I therefore decided to follow a novel way of doing critical discourse analysis, pioneered by Cukier et al [24,25]. This method is based on Habermas's validity claims [55].…”
Section: Critical Methodology -A Habermas Inspired Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to justify communicative validity of the ICT policy document, I hence decided to do a DA based on the framework introduced by Cukier et al (2004). This framework is grounded on Habermas' (1984) four validity claims: truth, legitimacy, sincerity, and clarity, which is operationalized by a set guiding question for each claim.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All identified claims were noted down in a conventional data sheet, and later the evaluation was done through an analytical explanation. Cukier et al (2004) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%