2020
DOI: 10.1353/csd.2020.0050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying Critical Whiteness Studies in College Student Development Theory and Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, psychology has relied on frameworks and theories that center on how individual white people develop or maintain a (un)awareness of whiteness, race, and racism, often through the lens of white identity development (e.g., Helms, 1990Helms, , 1995. Such analyses are critical for contextualizing how whiteness is lived and experienced on the microlevel, but often these analyses do not consider how identity maintains or disrupts systems of power (Applebaum, 2010;Foste & Irwin, 2020;Rogers, 2018). In other words, the individual is often the sole unit of analysis with a parochial focus on how a white person develops more critical, antiracist attitudes and actions (Hardiman & Keehn, 2012;Helms, 1995;S.…”
Section: A Critical Perspective On Whiteness and White Racial Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, psychology has relied on frameworks and theories that center on how individual white people develop or maintain a (un)awareness of whiteness, race, and racism, often through the lens of white identity development (e.g., Helms, 1990Helms, , 1995. Such analyses are critical for contextualizing how whiteness is lived and experienced on the microlevel, but often these analyses do not consider how identity maintains or disrupts systems of power (Applebaum, 2010;Foste & Irwin, 2020;Rogers, 2018). In other words, the individual is often the sole unit of analysis with a parochial focus on how a white person develops more critical, antiracist attitudes and actions (Hardiman & Keehn, 2012;Helms, 1995;S.…”
Section: A Critical Perspective On Whiteness and White Racial Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we contend that the normality of whiteness frequently serves to render the processes sustaining it imperceptible to those in power, framing whiteness as only invisible is fraught with problems. In critiquing this construction of whiteness as "invisible," Foste and Irwin (2020) [14] warned such framing-when applied uncritically-"ignores the lived experiences of People of Color with whiteness" (p. 448) for whom it is not always invisible. Identifying the normativity of whiteness (i.e., making the invisible, visible) was a central component of the higher education scholarship of the previous decade.…”
Section: Whiteness As 'Invisible'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do this as a loving critique of the current body of knowledge to which each of us has contributed. Most commonly, critical whiteness research in higher education engages whiteness as a normative and invisible backdrop (Cabrera, 2019;Foste & Irwin, 2020, Foste & Jones, 2020 [12][13][14][15]. Further, this body of literature largely does not take up the consequences of whiteness for People of Color.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this vein, Critical Race Theory (CRT) engages directly with power at all stages of the research process, through participatory and emancipatory methods of knowledge production (Bhopal 2000), through to the presentation and dissemination of data. Critical Race Methodology (CRM) therefore emphasises the moral obligation upon ethically aware researchers to be self-reflexive and 'power-conscious' in their analyses and re-presentations of social relationships and the human condition (Foste and Irwin 2020). A CRT approach is 'critical' in the sense that its corresponding methodologies interrogate the intersections of race, class, gender (and other majority/minority categories of social ordering)-rather than merely placing race at the top of a 'hierarchy of oppression', concealing commonality of subjugated experience (Briskin 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%