Disrupting the Big Lie: Higher Education and Whitelash in a Post/Colorblind Era

Abstract

James Baldwin (1998) described whiteness as “the big lie” of American society where the belief in the inherent superiority of white people allowed for, emboldened, and facilitated violence against People of Color. In the post-Civil Rights era, scholars reframed whiteness as an invisible, hegemonic social norm, and a great deal of education scholarship continues to be rooted in this metaphor of invisibility. However, Leonardo (2020) theorized that in a post-45 era of “whitelash” (Embrick et al., 2020), “post-colorblindness” is more accurate to describe contemporary racial stratification whereby whiteness is both (a) more visible and (b) increasingly appealing to perceived injuries of “reverse racism.” From this perspective, we offer three theoretical concepts to guide the future of whiteness in education scholarship. Specifically, we argue that scholars critically studying whiteness in education must explicitly: (1) address the historicity of whiteness, (2) analyze the public embrace of whiteness, and (3) emphasize the material consequences of whiteness on the lives of People of Color. By doing this, we argue that critical scholars of race in higher education will more clearly understand the changing nature of whiteness while avoiding the analytical trap of invisibility that is decreasingly relevant.

Discriminación y ciudadanía digital en ambientes de posgrado y especialización: Una revisión sistemática (2020-2023)

“…El escrutinio de la discriminación racial y de género en la educación superior es llevado a cabo meticulosamente por Whitehead et al (2021) (2020) . Rev.…”

Racialized-gendered Experiences and Mental Health Vulnerabilities of Young Asian Women in Toronto, Canada

“…Whiteness refers to a racial discourse that constructs the supposed racial superiority of White people of European descent over racialized people. This racialization produced White supremacy, which is codified and institutionalized (Fylkesnes, 2018;Whitehead et al, 2021). As White supremacy functions as an organizing principle that structures all aspects of social life, sociocultural ideologies and practices associated with Whiteness have become the taken-for-granted dominant and "mainstream" benchmark to measure the worthiness of racialized groups (Kumas-Tan et al, 2007).…”

Why Are All the White Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?: Toward Challenging Constructions of a Persecuted White Collective

“…They also allow us to interrogate what these narratives teach us about how to contest the limitations of diversity rhetoric not only in HBCUs but also in TWIs, Minority Serving Institutions in the U.S. (MSIs), and society more broadly. We follow the recommendation made by critical whiteness scholars to explore the embracing of whiteness by the general population and critically analyze its impact and implications on people of color [23]. In connection to this Special Issue, we argue that there is a growing need to recognize co-optation and other counterinsurgent strategies used against racial justice to ensure that future scholarship is transformative in its advancement of equity and structural change.…”