2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicator exposure to acetochlor based on biomonitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the day before spraying, urinary EMA concentrations were detected in only 66.7% farmers because the farmers might not have used acetochlor for a while before our visit, but it was still measurable in the urine, perhaps due to field contamination or storage near the home. Gustin et al [ 33 ] reported the detection frequency of urinary EMA (24 h composite urine) of farmers spraying acetochlor as 15, 100, and 100% the day before spraying, the spraying day, and the day after spraying using open- and closed-tractor cab spraying. Furthermore, the detection frequency of Gustin et al’s [ 33 ] study was higher than the current study on the spray days because of the longer duration of spraying, higher spraying volume, and spraying continuously for 5 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the day before spraying, urinary EMA concentrations were detected in only 66.7% farmers because the farmers might not have used acetochlor for a while before our visit, but it was still measurable in the urine, perhaps due to field contamination or storage near the home. Gustin et al [ 33 ] reported the detection frequency of urinary EMA (24 h composite urine) of farmers spraying acetochlor as 15, 100, and 100% the day before spraying, the spraying day, and the day after spraying using open- and closed-tractor cab spraying. Furthermore, the detection frequency of Gustin et al’s [ 33 ] study was higher than the current study on the spray days because of the longer duration of spraying, higher spraying volume, and spraying continuously for 5 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gustin et al [ 33 ] reported the detection frequency of urinary EMA (24 h composite urine) of farmers spraying acetochlor as 15, 100, and 100% the day before spraying, the spraying day, and the day after spraying using open- and closed-tractor cab spraying. Furthermore, the detection frequency of Gustin et al’s [ 33 ] study was higher than the current study on the spray days because of the longer duration of spraying, higher spraying volume, and spraying continuously for 5 days. Gustin et al’s [ 33 ] study also reported urinary EMA concentrations of open- and closed-tractor cabins of 0.004 and 0.002 mg/kg bw/day, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These total dose values are similar to those reported for acetochlor in the urine of exposed workers (2 and 4 mg per kg bw per day). 17 If 40% of an applied dose of propiconazole is absorbed through the skin (estimated from a rat dermal absorption study 4 ), the relative contribution of dermal exposure to the total systemic exposure may be significant. In addition, the release of propiconazole as an aerosol during pesticide application may enhance dermal exposure due to increased deposition onto the skin compared to vapors as a result of larger particle size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although plasma pseudocholinesterase levels can be measured, they do not correlate directly to any clinical response [3]. Biomonitoring of urinary metabolites [10] may be a beneficial solution to find the intoxication level of every patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%