1954
DOI: 10.2172/4353680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of Monte Carlo

Abstract: This report was prepared a s an account of Government aponeored work. Neither the United States, nor the Commission, nor any person acting on b e W of the Cornmiemlow A. Makes any warranty or representation, express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any information, apparatus, method, or process discloeed In this report may not infringe privately owned rights; or B. Assumea any liabilities with respect to the us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
2

Year Published

1972
1972
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our method is similar to that of Canfield et al (1987), but we sample from a MaxwellBoltzmann electron distribution rather than a relativistic one. We refer to Kahn (1956), Everett & Cashwell (1983), and Kalos & Whitlock (1986) for details on sampling from Maxwell-Boltzmann and Klein-Nishina distributions.…”
Section: Appendix Monte Carlo Methods For Compton Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method is similar to that of Canfield et al (1987), but we sample from a MaxwellBoltzmann electron distribution rather than a relativistic one. We refer to Kahn (1956), Everett & Cashwell (1983), and Kalos & Whitlock (1986) for details on sampling from Maxwell-Boltzmann and Klein-Nishina distributions.…”
Section: Appendix Monte Carlo Methods For Compton Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A source particle at R has its weight modified by the factor S k R ) / Q R ) , and each particle that enters collision at R from a previous 15 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(27) first. Kahn's rejection method is employed for photons below 1.5 MeV [12] and Koblinger's method for E > 1.5 MeV [13], following Blomquist and Gelbard [14]. The candidate is then accepted or rejected against the incoherent scattering function [11].…”
Section: Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%