2016
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637x/832/2/102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Atmospheres for X-Ray Bursting Neutron Stars

Abstract: The hydrogen and helium accreted by X-ray bursting neutron stars is periodically consumed in runaway thermonuclear reactions that cause the entire surface to glow brightly in X-rays for a few seconds. With models of the emission, the mass and radius of the neutron star can be inferred from the observations. By simultaneously probing neutron star masses and radii, X-ray bursts (XRBs) are one of the strongest diagnostics of the nature of matter at extremely high densities. Accurate determinations of these parame… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(153 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applying such a correction would increase the inferred radius by a factor of f 2 c = (T c /T ef f ) 2 , where T c and T ef f are the color (measured) and effective temperatures, respectively, and f c is the so-called hardening factor. Based on model atmosphere calculations, f c is likely to fall within the range from ≈ 1.2 − 1.5 (Medin et al 2016;Suleimanov et al 2011), resulting in an increase in inferred radius by a factor of ≈ 1.4 − 2.2. However, given the other assumptions and uncertainties, the value is at least approximately consistent with expectations for surface emission from a neutron star.…”
Section: Properties Of Mhz Oscillationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying such a correction would increase the inferred radius by a factor of f 2 c = (T c /T ef f ) 2 , where T c and T ef f are the color (measured) and effective temperatures, respectively, and f c is the so-called hardening factor. Based on model atmosphere calculations, f c is likely to fall within the range from ≈ 1.2 − 1.5 (Medin et al 2016;Suleimanov et al 2011), resulting in an increase in inferred radius by a factor of ≈ 1.4 − 2.2. However, given the other assumptions and uncertainties, the value is at least approximately consistent with expectations for surface emission from a neutron star.…”
Section: Properties Of Mhz Oscillationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is thought to be the moment when the photosphere "touches down" on the NS surface at the end of the PRE. By knowing the distance to a source and associating the touchdown flux with the Eddington flux, it is possible to constrain the NS radius R. However, the measurements may be subject to considerable systematic errors (Boutloukos et al 2010;Steiner et al 2010;Suleimanov et al 2011;Miller 2013;Medin et al 2016;Miller & Lamb 2016). This is partly due to spectral modeling uncertainties, such as how the color-correction factor, which enters the fit to R, depends on luminosity and composition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swank et al 1977;Hoffman et al 1977), although the underlying physics is complex and only captured by appropriate NS atmosphere models (e.g. London et al 1986;Lapidus et al 1986; see Suleimanov et al 2011bSuleimanov et al , 2012Nättilä et al 2015;Medin et al 2016 for recent computations). In some cases rapid variability on millisecond time scales, so-called burst oscillations, are detected during X-ray bursts and these can be used to infer the spin period of the NS (Strohmayer et al 1996; see Strohmayer and Bildsten 2006; Watts 2012 for reviews).…”
Section: Type-i X-ray Burstsmentioning
confidence: 99%