Emerging Dairy Processing Technologies 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118560471.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of High‐Pressure Homogenization and Microfluidization for Milk and Dairy Products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MPa for D [(4, 3)] and a D [(3, 2)] are of about 0.5 µm and 0.2 µm. For non-homogenized milk, respective values of 4.5 µm and 1 µm are usually observed (Tobin, Heffernan, Mulvihill, Huppertz, & Kelly, 2015). Table 2 shows the fat particle size distribution of raw, pasteurised and HPP milk samples after 0 and 7 days of storage at 4 o C. In the present study, HPP of milk at 600 MPa for 3 min did not result in a significant reduction of the fat particle size.…”
Section: Effect Of Hpp On Fat Particlessupporting
confidence: 46%
“…MPa for D [(4, 3)] and a D [(3, 2)] are of about 0.5 µm and 0.2 µm. For non-homogenized milk, respective values of 4.5 µm and 1 µm are usually observed (Tobin, Heffernan, Mulvihill, Huppertz, & Kelly, 2015). Table 2 shows the fat particle size distribution of raw, pasteurised and HPP milk samples after 0 and 7 days of storage at 4 o C. In the present study, HPP of milk at 600 MPa for 3 min did not result in a significant reduction of the fat particle size.…”
Section: Effect Of Hpp On Fat Particlessupporting
confidence: 46%
“…Micro fluidization at 150 MPa for fat-free yoghurts had a negative impact on product quality and increased syneresis while decreasing hardness, cohesiveness, and viscosity. Low-fat yoghurt exposed to the same process did not significantly differ in terms of texture or water retention from that created by traditional homogenization (Tobin et al, 2015).…”
Section: Yoghurtmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Microfluidization produced substantially smaller fat globule sizes (0.22 m) in milk than conventional homogenization due to its higher homogenization efficiency. The amount of fat separation during storage is reduced by microfluidization, and it has been shown that UHT milk that has undergone this process can stay stable for up to nine months on the shelf without separation, as opposed to two to three months for UHT milk that has undergone conventional homogenization (Hardham et al, 2000;Tobin et al, 2015). Regardless of the prior heating treatments like pasteurization, thermization, or UHT, microfluidization did not appreciably alter the level of the majority of volatile chemicals.In particular, butanoic, n-decanoic, and carboxylic acid concentrations remain unchanged.…”
Section: Milkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The larger fat globules created by microfluidization were coated with smaller fractions through protein bridges, and some of the tiniest fat globules were embedded within casein micelles. 13 Li et al 14 produced whole soybean milk using an industrial-scale microfluidizer that was stable for storage at least 21 days at 4 °C without the addition of any stabilizer or emulsifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, milk treated with microfluidization had a transparent layer of fat globules of approximately 10 nm in thickness instead of huge micellar clumps produced by the conventional homogenization, and the thickness decreased significantly with increasing pressure 12 . The larger fat globules created by microfluidization were coated with smaller fractions through protein bridges, and some of the tiniest fat globules were embedded within casein micelles 13 . Li et al 14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%