2008
DOI: 10.1117/12.777322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application specific electrode-integrated nanotube cathodes (ASINCs) for miniature analytical instruments for space exploration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the ionization efficiency of our devices is almost four times larger than the ionization efficiency reported by Chen et al using arrays of double-gated isolated PECVD CNTs, with argon at 5.6 mtorr [48]. In addition, our devices have an estimated field factor from the FN plot that is 50% larger than the corresponding values reported by Manohara et al [39], which implies that our ionizer can extract more current and, hence, produce more ion current with less bias voltage. We speculate that the smaller field factor in the work of Manohara et al is related to the shadowing effect that their CNTs suffer due to their proximity within the same fiber.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the ionization efficiency of our devices is almost four times larger than the ionization efficiency reported by Chen et al using arrays of double-gated isolated PECVD CNTs, with argon at 5.6 mtorr [48]. In addition, our devices have an estimated field factor from the FN plot that is 50% larger than the corresponding values reported by Manohara et al [39], which implies that our ionizer can extract more current and, hence, produce more ion current with less bias voltage. We speculate that the smaller field factor in the work of Manohara et al is related to the shadowing effect that their CNTs suffer due to their proximity within the same fiber.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Yoon et al reported a MEMS ionizer that uses a tungsten filament [33], a nickel filament [34], or carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [34] as electron source, although no ionization data were provided. Other researchers have developed CNT-based EIIs suitable for portable MS, including Hwang et al [35], Bower et al [36], Chen et al [37], Park et al [38], and Manohara et al [39]. In addition, low-power, portable, and high-pressure operation compatible glow-discharge ionizers have been developed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our ionizer should have higher ionization efficiency if operated at higher pressures. In addition, our ionizer has an estimated field factor in the linear part of the FN plot that is 50% larger than the corresponding values reported by Manohara et al [19], which should be related to the shadowing effect that their CNTs suffer due to their proximity within the same fiber.…”
Section: Experimental Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…After initially achieving> 2 A1cm 2 at 4 V/Jlm, we have optimized the CNT growth process and the architecture in recent times to routinely produce 10 to 25 A1cm 2 at applied fields of5 to 10 V/Jlm [7]. These tests were conducted using CNT bundle array samples that occupied a circular area of 100 Jlm diameter (see Figure 2(a)), which is considered a large area source for our applications.…”
Section: Application Specific Electrode-integrated Nanotube Cathodes mentioning
confidence: 99%