Application of UAV Remote Sensing for a Population Census of Large Wild Herbivores—Taking the Headwater Region of the Yellow River as an Example

Abstract

We used unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to carry out a relatively complete population census of large wild herbivores in Maduo County on the Tibetan Plateau in the spring of 2017. The effective area covered by aerial surveys was 326.6 km 2 , and 23,784 images were acquired. Interpretation tag libraries for UAV images were created for wild animals, including Kiang (Equus kiang), Tibetan gazelle (Procapra picticaudata), and blue sheep (Pseudois nayaur), as well as livestock, including yaks and Tibetan sheep. Large wild herbivores in the survey transect were identified through manual imagery interpretation. Densities ranged from 1.15/km 2 for Kiang, 0.61/km 2 for Tibetan gazelle, 0.62/km 2 for blue sheep, 4.12/km 2 for domestic yak, and 7.34/km 2 for domestic sheep. A method based on meadows in the cold and warm seasons was used for estimating the densities and numbers of large wild herbivores and livestock, and was verified against records of livestock numbers. Population estimates for Kiang, Tibetan gazelle, blue sheep, domestic yak, and domestic sheep were 17,109, 15,961, 9324, 70,846, and 102,194, respectively. Based on published consumption estimates, the results suggest that domestic stock consume 4.5 times the amount of vegetation of large wild herbivores. Compared with traditional ground survey methods, performance of UAV remote sensing surveys of large wild herbivore populations was fast, economical and reliable, providing an effective future method for surveying wild animals.

Fine-Resolution Population Mapping from International Space Station Nighttime Photography and Multisource Social Sensing Data Based on Similarity Matching

“…Population distribution information, as an important index in urban planning and resource allocation, has been widely studied with the adoption of remote sensing data sources in numerous studies [15,42,78]. Although multiple sources of remote sensing data have provided comprehensive spatial information of urban environment, the lack of human activity information still restricts the accuracy of population mapping.…”

Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive Tibetan wild ass ( Equus kiang )

“…; Guo et al . ). With the development of wildlife protection plans, the change in environment during ex‐situ conservation comes with a change in animal health.…”

“…It is a key protected species in China and is listed in the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List 2012 of threatened species. Intensive research has been performed regarding the conservation of this species (Joseph and Bard-Jorgen 2005;Yifan and Jianping 2006;Yin et al 2007;St-Louis and Côt e 2009;Kefena et al 2012;Dong et al 2015;Guo et al 2018). With the development of wildlife protection plans, the change in environment during ex-situ conservation comes with a change in animal health.…”

A standardized protocol for reporting methods when using drones for wildlife research

“…Drones (Chapman 2014) are increasingly popular tools in the natural sciences and are notably being used for a growing variety of wildlife-related applications, including: monitoring of birds Ratcliffe et al 2015;Weissensteiner et al 2015;McEvoy et al 2016), marine mammals (Hodgson et al 2013(Hodgson et al , 2017Koski et al 2015;Moreland et al 2015;Adame et al 2017;Pirotta et al 2017;Barnas et al 2018b), large terrestrial mammals (Vermeulen et al 2013;Guo et al 2018;Su et al 2018;Hu et al 2020), primates (Van Andel et al 2015;Wich et al 2016;Bonnin et al 2018), and reptiles (Elsey and Trosclair 2016;Schofield et al 2017;Thapa et al 2018); wildlife habitat assessment and modeling (Chabot et al 2014;Puttock et al 2015;Fraser et al 2016;Marcaccio et al 2016;Olsoy et al 2018); and wildlife conflict management (Israel 2011;Mulero-Pázmány et al 2013, 2014Olivares-Mendez et al 2015;Michez et al 2016). The steady progression of drones into the toolkits of wildlife researchers and managers has been documented through a growing number of literature reviews (Anderson and Gaston 2013;Linchant et al 2015;Christie et al 2016;Borrelle and Fletcher 2017;Fiori et al 2017;Mulero-Pázmány et al 2017;Mustafa et al 2018;…”