2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-011-3492-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the central composite design in optimization of laser transformation hardening parameters of commercially pure titanium using Nd:YAG laser

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 'lack of fit F-value' is not significant reflecting a good condition as it means that the model is fit. The R-squared value of 0.9183 also expressed that the model is fit while the adequate precision that measures the signal to noise ratio with value of 14.85, which is greater than 4 shows that it is desirable [19,20] and can be used to navigate the design space. Not significant E (g/m 3 ) = -1.5384 + 6.4713A + 0.0385B + 0.0019C + 0.8490AB -0.0086AC -0.0162B 2 (3)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'lack of fit F-value' is not significant reflecting a good condition as it means that the model is fit. The R-squared value of 0.9183 also expressed that the model is fit while the adequate precision that measures the signal to noise ratio with value of 14.85, which is greater than 4 shows that it is desirable [19,20] and can be used to navigate the design space. Not significant E (g/m 3 ) = -1.5384 + 6.4713A + 0.0385B + 0.0019C + 0.8490AB -0.0086AC -0.0162B 2 (3)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response surface methodology study used CCD; several points are evaluated which increases the chances of detecting the response at which the optimum for a factor occurs. The parameters studied (− α , −1, 0, +1, and α ) in CCD, where levels −1 and +1 represent the low and high values, − α and α indicate the low and high extreme values, and 0 is the center value of each parameter [ 17 , 18 ], were shown in Tables 2 , 3 , and 4 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the equation of other mathematical models developed to predict the dimensions of the weld bead as a function of the operational variables were verified using the coefficient of determination and the Fisher test [4,12,13]. Although several statistical designs have been developed to predict the geometry of the bead, only two authors mentioned the welding position within the input variables of their experiments [4,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%