2018
DOI: 10.29333/ejmste/91451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of the APOS-ACE Theory to improve Students’ Graphical Understanding of Derivative

Abstract: APOS-ACE (Action, Process, Object, and Schema-Activities, Classroom discussion, and Exercises) is applied in this article to explore the teaching and learning of derivative by giving emphasis on its graphical understanding. For this purpose, a Genetic Decomposition is developed based on the outcomes of previous studies and on our personal teaching experiences. An ACE cycle is designed with the help of the Maple software and implemented on a group of freshmen Iranian students (experimental group). The outcomes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students in the first year of the university face difficulties in solving the calculus questions where input information is given only through graphical or numerical representations (Borji, Font, Alamolhodaei, & Sánchez, 2018;Baker et al, 2000;Cooley et al, 2007). Many research have recommended that, in order to achieve a conceptual understanding of a mathematical concept, it is better to start learning that concept in its various representations and connections between them (Baker et al, 2000;Borji, Alamolhodaei, & Radmehr, 2018;Dreher & Kuntze, 2015;Goldin & Shteingold, 2001;Kendal & Stacey, 2003;Özmantar et al, 2010;Pape & Tchoshanov, 2001;Ronda, 2015). Students usually learn derivative and integral concepts in high school for the first time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Students in the first year of the university face difficulties in solving the calculus questions where input information is given only through graphical or numerical representations (Borji, Font, Alamolhodaei, & Sánchez, 2018;Baker et al, 2000;Cooley et al, 2007). Many research have recommended that, in order to achieve a conceptual understanding of a mathematical concept, it is better to start learning that concept in its various representations and connections between them (Baker et al, 2000;Borji, Alamolhodaei, & Radmehr, 2018;Dreher & Kuntze, 2015;Goldin & Shteingold, 2001;Kendal & Stacey, 2003;Özmantar et al, 2010;Pape & Tchoshanov, 2001;Ronda, 2015). Students usually learn derivative and integral concepts in high school for the first time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers (e.g., Baker, et al, 2000;Borji, Alamolhodaei, & Radmehr, 2018;Dreher & Kuntze, 2015;Goldin & Shteingold, 2001;Kendal & Stacey, 2003;Özmantar et al, 2010;Pape & Tchoshanov, 2001;Ronda, 2015) have explored the importance of representations in developing mathematical understanding. Goldin and Shteingold (2001) explained that representations (algebraic, graphical, numerical, and textual) are important for the learning of mathematical concepts because of the coherent structure contained within each representation.…”
Section: / 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that a GD is not unique, one mathematical concept can has more than one GD. A GD is as a useful cognitive model, as evidenced by the results of several empirical studies that show the effectiveness of the APOS as an efficient tool for design and analysis of instruction (Borji, Alamolhodaei, & Radmehr 2018;Weller, Arnon, & Dubinsky, 2011).…”
Section: Apos Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematical software and graphing calculator (Chien, 2019;Sevimli, 2016) are among the technology tools that have been surveyed. Despite the positive results reported, some researchers have argued about its effectiveness to accommodate students of different learning styles, pace, and engagement levels (Borji, Alamolhodaei & Radmehr, 2018). Researchers commented that technology will never replace the role and effectiveness of hands-on learning approach, mainly due to the implementation difficulties in terms of the level of integrating the technology, and its didactical nature in terms of the usage (Hong & Thomas, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%