Application of the analytic hierarchy process to select characterization and risk-based decision-making and management methods for hazardous waste sites

Hartman, Don; Goltz, Mark N.

doi:10.1007/s100220100035

Cited by 9 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In solving problems using explicit logical analysis, there are three principles that underlie AHP thinking: the principle of compiling a hierarchy, the principle of setting priorities, and the principle of logical consistency (Hartman & Goltz, 2001).…”

Section: Main Principles In Ahpmentioning

confidence: 99%

Human Resource Scorecard (HRSC) and Objective Matrix as Performance Measurement and Performance Booster Method to Optimize Production Performance

Hardi

Supardi

Angelo

et al. 2019

IJMMU

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development technology is something that happens quickly and surely this is marked by the number of new manufacturing companies that are emerging and spreading throughout the world. In the manufacturing industry the most important thing that must always be maintained is production efficiency, but the majority of industries only pay attention to the efficiency aspects of their production activities without regard to the aspects of humans who work in the industry. Human resource scorecard (HRSC) is an appropriate measurement method in identifying and measuring the relationship between workers, strategy, and performance to produce a good company. This human resource performance measurement is looking at business units from four perspectives: financial perspective (F), the customer (C), internal business process (I), and learning and growth (L). Each perspective in HRSC weighted by Analytical Hierarchy process method and then calculated by Objective Matrix (OMAX) to identify which category needed an extra attention and need to be repaired. The end result of OMAX will be reviewed by management theory so the solution made in this analysis will produce the best end result that needed by the company. This measurement is very critical to the company because the competition between company is getting tougher nowadays. HRSC measurement was carried in PT OCM by describing the company’s vision and mission into human resource action whose contribution can be measured using AHP analysis in 4 perspectives: financial perspective with a weight of 0.396, customer perspective (employee) with a weight of 0.118, internal business perspective with a weight of 0.240, and growth and development perspective with a weight of 0.247 after that PT OCM use that measurement in OMAX method to determine what KPI needed extra attention and repairment, management based theory will be applied in that solution to give the best result.

show abstract

Section: Main Principles In Ahpmentioning

confidence: 99%

Human Resource Scorecard (HRSC) and Objective Matrix as Performance Measurement and Performance Booster Method to Optimize Production Performance

Hardi

Supardi

Angelo

et al. 2019

IJMMU

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A utilização do método AHP é bem aceita pelos usuários devido ao fato de que, muitas vezes, os critérios que estão em análise pelos usuários do método são conflitantes (Hartman & Goltz, 2002), sendo o método próprio para estas situações.…”

Section: Método Multicritério Analytic Hierarchyunclassified

Método multicritério de tomada de decisão: aplicação ao caso da localização espacial de uma Unidade de Pronto Atendimento – UPA 24 h

Briozo

Musetti

2015

Gest. Prod.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents the results of applying a multicriteria decision-making method -Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to identify the best location to install an Emergency Keywords: Location of facilities; Multicriteria decision-making methods -AHP; Emergency unit.Resumo: Este trabalho apresenta os resultados da aplicação de um método multicritério de tomada de decisão -Analytic Hierarchy Process-AHP, visando identificar o melhor local de instalação de uma Unidade de Pronto Atendimento -UPA 24 h, com a participação de profissionais ligados à gestão pública de um município do interior do Estado de São Paulo. Para a consecução da pesquisa, houve a condução de reuniões junto aos participantes no intuito de 1) apresentar o método AHP; 2) construir conjuntamente com os membros do grupo os critérios, subcritérios e identificar as alternativas de localização; 3) validar o modelo gerado; e 4) aplicar os questionários para obtenção do ranqueamento das alternativas de localização. A aplicação do método AHP permitiu hierarquizar os locais candidatos, apresentando o "Local 1" como o mais bem ranqueado, servindo de subsídio para o gestor municipal tomar a decisão para a instalação da UPA 24 h. Palavras-chave:Localização de instalações; Métodos multicritério para tomada de decisão; Método AHP; Unidade de Pronto Atendimento.

show abstract

“…Although a powerful tool, adaptive management is a complex, challenging, sometimes contentious process that requires skilled leadership and strong buy‐in from stakeholders, even when the goals are simple. Although there is a lack of guidance for implementing adaptive management for ecological restoration of contaminated lands per se, there is guidance for adaptive management related to management of natural resource systems (Allan and Stankey ) and there is specific guidance developed for the remediation phase (Hartman and Goltz ; Parnell et al ; Linkov et al ). The broader decision science literature for ecological and environmental management also contains useful guidance (Linkov and Moberg ).…”

Section: Monitoring and Adaptive Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Opportunities and challenges of integrating ecological restoration into assessment and management of contaminated ecosystems

Hull

Luoma

Bayne

et al. 2015

Integr Envir Assess & Manag

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ecosystem restoration planning near the beginning of the site assessment and management process ("early integration") involves consideration of restoration goals from the outset in developing solutions for contaminated ecosystems. There are limitations to integration that stem from institutional barriers, few successful precedents, and limited availability of guidance. Challenges occur in integrating expertise from various disciplines and multiple, sometimes divergent interests and goals. The more complex process can result in timing, capacity, communication, and collaboration challenges. On the other hand, integrating the 2 approaches presents new and creative opportunities. For example, integration allows early planning for expanding ecosystem services on or near contaminated lands or waters that might otherwise have been unaddressed by remediation alone. Integrated plans can explicitly pursue ecosystem services that have market value, which can add to funds for long-term monitoring and management. Early integration presents opportunities for improved and productive collaboration and coordination between ecosystem restoration and contaminant assessment and management. Examples exist where early integration facilitates liability resolution and generates positive public relations. Restoration planning and implementation before the completion of the contaminated site assessment, remediation, or management process ("early restoration") can facilitate coordination with off-site restoration options and a regional approach to restoration of contaminated environments. Integration of performance monitoring, for both remedial and restoration actions, can save resources and expand the interpretive power of results. Early integration may aid experimentation, which may be more feasible on contaminated lands than in many other situations. The potential application of concepts and tools from adaptive management is discussed as a way of avoiding pitfalls and achieving benefits in early integration. In any case, there will be challenges with early integration of restoration concepts for contaminated ecosystems, but the benefits are likely to outweigh them. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2016;12:296-305.

show abstract

Application of the analytic hierarchy process to select characterization and risk-based decision-making and management methods for hazardous waste sites

Cited by 9 publications

References 3 publications

Human Resource Scorecard (HRSC) and Objective Matrix as Performance Measurement and Performance Booster Method to Optimize Production Performance

Human Resource Scorecard (HRSC) and Objective Matrix as Performance Measurement and Performance Booster Method to Optimize Production Performance

Método multicritério de tomada de decisão: aplicação ao caso da localização espacial de uma Unidade de Pronto Atendimento – UPA 24 h

Opportunities and challenges of integrating ecological restoration into assessment and management of contaminated ecosystems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About