2011
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.201184250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of statistical dynamical diffraction theory to highly defective ion implanted SiGe heterostructures

Abstract: The statistical dynamical diffraction theory (SDDT) provides a method for performing high resolution X-ray diffraction (HRXRD) analyses from materials that contain high levels of structural imperfection. SDDT is implemented by combining kinematical and dynamical diffraction formalisms into a single framework through the inclusion of two parameters (a static Debye-Waller factor and a correlation length) that can provide an adjustable coupling between the kinematic and dynamic extremes. Typically one of the prom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the ion implantation became a routine tool for purposeful modifying the structure of subsurface crystal layers, the various theoretical models have been developed to describe the X‐ray diffraction patterns, in particular, the rocking curves measured from such crystal structures with inhomogeneous strain fields. In whole, the most of these models could be subdivided into two groups, which make use of the semi‐kinematical or dynamical approximations , respectively. The first group of so‐called semi‐kinematical (or known also as kinematical ) models is characterized by the summation of kinematical scattering amplitudes from thin ion‐implanted layers and dynamical scattering amplitude from a thick substrate.…”
Section: Characterization Of Ion‐implanted Crystals By X‐ray Diffractmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the ion implantation became a routine tool for purposeful modifying the structure of subsurface crystal layers, the various theoretical models have been developed to describe the X‐ray diffraction patterns, in particular, the rocking curves measured from such crystal structures with inhomogeneous strain fields. In whole, the most of these models could be subdivided into two groups, which make use of the semi‐kinematical or dynamical approximations , respectively. The first group of so‐called semi‐kinematical (or known also as kinematical ) models is characterized by the summation of kinematical scattering amplitudes from thin ion‐implanted layers and dynamical scattering amplitude from a thick substrate.…”
Section: Characterization Of Ion‐implanted Crystals By X‐ray Diffractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These analytical solutions have been obtained from both Takagi–Taupin equations in real space and wave equation in momentum space according to the Ewald–Bethe‐Laue approach, supposing the lamina are defect‐free and diffuse scattering is absent (except for Ref. ).…”
Section: Characterization Of Ion‐implanted Crystals By X‐ray Diffractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of this approach for the analysis of highly defective layers is not recommended, however. For example, fully relaxed silicon-germanium epitaxial layers grown with high Ge concentrations on silicon substrates are very poorly described using the dynamical diffraction theory (Shreeman & Matyi, 2010), as is structurally defective ion-implanted SiGe with a range of germanium concentrations (Shreeman & Matyi, 2011). A purely dynamical analysis strategy is not appropriate for the analysis of these cases of fully or partially relaxed samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have found, however, that broadening effects due to the presence of defects in the substrate will have an impact on the diffracted amplitude and need to be incorporated into the SDDT model. This essential modification of the SDDT is detailed in recent work (Shreeman & Matyi, 2010, 2011Shreeman, 2012). In this approach the basic definition E c h ¼ R mÀ1 E c o is used, where the reflection coefficient from a given layer is defined in terms of the amplitude emerging from the material beneath.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%