2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10248983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics to Structural Cable Analysis

Abstract: In this study, a numerical model is proposed for the analysis of a simply supported structural cable. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH)—a mesh-free, Lagrangian method with advantages for analysis of highly deformable bodies—is utilized to model a cable. In the proposed numerical model, it is assumed that a cable has only longitudinal stiffness in tension. Accordingly, SPH equations derived for solid mechanics are adapted for a structural cable, for the first time. Besides, a proper damping parameter is int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Q-statistics were found to be significant (p < .00, Q = 499.10 with df = 44) The I 2 value, which is another method of testing heterogeneity, was found to be 91.18%. As the I 2 statistic, which enables comment on the amount of variance in correlated measurements, approaches zero, it is stated that the observed variance is not real (Dinçer, 2022). The I 2 value of 91.18% obtained in this research indicates a high level of heterogeneity (Higgins & Thompson, 2002).…”
Section: Heterogeneity and Meta-analyses Of Effect Sizementioning
confidence: 51%
“…The Q-statistics were found to be significant (p < .00, Q = 499.10 with df = 44) The I 2 value, which is another method of testing heterogeneity, was found to be 91.18%. As the I 2 statistic, which enables comment on the amount of variance in correlated measurements, approaches zero, it is stated that the observed variance is not real (Dinçer, 2022). The I 2 value of 91.18% obtained in this research indicates a high level of heterogeneity (Higgins & Thompson, 2002).…”
Section: Heterogeneity and Meta-analyses Of Effect Sizementioning
confidence: 51%
“…These are fixed effects model and random-effects model. The researcher needs to determine in advance which model to act according to the analysis process (Dinçer, 2014). In order to make a more generalizable study and because it is a model recommended to be used in the field of social sciences (Cumming, 2012), this study was based on the random-effects model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The odds ratio and the hedge's G impact size value were used in the analysis as effect size statistics. 25 26 The information was examined using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis program (CMA 3.0). Either a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model was used to compute the effect size value with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%