2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6ay01169a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of QuEChERS-based purification coupled with isotope dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method for the determination of N-nitrosamines in soy sauce

Abstract: A sensitive and rapid method involving an improved approach called the quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) purification method and isotope dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was established to determine six N-nitrosamines (NAs) in soy sauce. Samples were firstly extracted by ethyl acetate. Then the extraction solution was concentrated by slow nitrogen gas blowing and subsequently purified using the QuEChERS-based purification method. Separation of six target NAs was pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The matrix effect (ME) was evaluated by the ratio of the two with reference to the standard solution of the same concentration prepared by pure solvent, that is, the formula ME = B/A, where A and B represent the peak areas of analytes in pure solvent and blank sample matrix solution, respectively. If ME < 0.8, it indicates that the matrix has a significant inhibition on the response of analytes; if ME > 1.2, it indicates that the matrix will significantly enhance the response of analytes; if 0.8 ≤ ME ≤ 1.2, it indicates that the matrix effect is not significant ( 23 , 32 ). The experimental results are shown in Figure 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matrix effect (ME) was evaluated by the ratio of the two with reference to the standard solution of the same concentration prepared by pure solvent, that is, the formula ME = B/A, where A and B represent the peak areas of analytes in pure solvent and blank sample matrix solution, respectively. If ME < 0.8, it indicates that the matrix has a significant inhibition on the response of analytes; if ME > 1.2, it indicates that the matrix will significantly enhance the response of analytes; if 0.8 ≤ ME ≤ 1.2, it indicates that the matrix effect is not significant ( 23 , 32 ). The experimental results are shown in Figure 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most effective solvent for extracting the samples therefore needed to identified. MeCN, ethyl acetate, and n -hexane are frequently used to extract samples when determining pesticide residues. We therefore compared the recoveries achieved using MeCN, ethyl acetate, and n -hexane to extract the samples. As shown in Figure , taking orange as an example, the ethyl acetate gave low IND-diam (<35%) and IND-olef (<40%) recoveries, but satisfactory recoveries of the other analytes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limits of detection (LOD) and quantitation (LOQ) were determined using spiked samples (free from halquinol) that were extracted and quantified as described in Section 2. LOD and LOQ values were calculated as 3 and 10 times the signal‐to‐noise ratio, respectively (Zeng, Bai, Xian, Dong, & Luo, ). As shown in Table , the LODs and LOQs were 3 and 5 μg/kg for 5,7‐dichloroquinolin‐8‐ol and 4 and 10 μg/kg for 5‐chloroquinolin‐8‐ol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%