Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2683(20000501)21:9<1899::aid-elps1899>3.0.co;2-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of proteomics for determining protein markers for wool quality traits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wool fiber characteristics, such as diameter, crimps, and length, are essential parameters of the wool trait, as well as important indications of the spinning efficiency of the wool (Plowman et al, 2009). Previous studies have shown that variations in the protein compositions of the orthocortex and paracortex, which make up nearly the whole wool fiber, were highly related with wool trait parameters (Marshall et al, 1991;Plowman et al, 2000). Particularly, the formation of KAP composites gives the wool special mechanical attributes of strength, inertness, and rigidity (Parry and Steinert, 1992;Plowman, 2003;Plowman et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Wool fiber characteristics, such as diameter, crimps, and length, are essential parameters of the wool trait, as well as important indications of the spinning efficiency of the wool (Plowman et al, 2009). Previous studies have shown that variations in the protein compositions of the orthocortex and paracortex, which make up nearly the whole wool fiber, were highly related with wool trait parameters (Marshall et al, 1991;Plowman et al, 2000). Particularly, the formation of KAP composites gives the wool special mechanical attributes of strength, inertness, and rigidity (Parry and Steinert, 1992;Plowman, 2003;Plowman et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…CBB G) proved to give higher sensitivity than the silver patterns stained in parallel. Those gave negatively stained spots for intermediate filament proteins, the major high sulfur proteins and the high glycine tyrosine proteins [193]. Lopez et al [68] found about 90% similar proteins in silver-and SYPRO Ruby stained rat fibroblast cell lysates, whereas Chevallet et al [55] showed differential images obtained with acidic, ammoniacal and the Shevchenko silver stains, and RuBP, for human erythrocyte membrane and mouse macrophage cell line proteins.…”
Section: Examples From Literature (For Comparison Of Different Dyes)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major part of them can subsequently be analyzed using classical techniques. Separation by electrophoresis41 and isoelectric focusing was successfully used to identify species‐specific keratins,37, 40 and sequencing data from many different types of keratins have been published 25, 37…”
Section: The Tyrolean Mummymentioning
confidence: 99%