2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3774(99)00087-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of pesticide simulation models to the Vredepeel dataset

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As suggested there, there is a need to redefine the limits of the plant available water used in the calculation, which in turn depends on the field capacity and the wilting point. However, the RMSE obtained here, ranging between 0.011 and 0.149 m 3 m -3 , is in line with similar works (Diekküger et al, 1995;Vanclooster & Boesten, 2000;Jalota & Arora, 2002;Zhang & Wegehenkel, 2006), and with remotely sensed estimations of soil moisture, such as SMOS (Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity from the European Space Agency) and SMAP (Soil Moisture Active-Passive from NASA), targeted in an RMSE of 0.04 m 3 m -3 . It is necessary to note the higher RMSE values in the case of the three forest-pasture stations at surface layer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As suggested there, there is a need to redefine the limits of the plant available water used in the calculation, which in turn depends on the field capacity and the wilting point. However, the RMSE obtained here, ranging between 0.011 and 0.149 m 3 m -3 , is in line with similar works (Diekküger et al, 1995;Vanclooster & Boesten, 2000;Jalota & Arora, 2002;Zhang & Wegehenkel, 2006), and with remotely sensed estimations of soil moisture, such as SMOS (Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity from the European Space Agency) and SMAP (Soil Moisture Active-Passive from NASA), targeted in an RMSE of 0.04 m 3 m -3 . It is necessary to note the higher RMSE values in the case of the three forest-pasture stations at surface layer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…PEARL and its predecessors have been tested against experimental data (e.g. Boesten and Gottesbueren, 2000;Tiktak, 2000;Vanclooster and Boesten, 2000;Bouraoui, 2007). The model was also tested and functionality added or improved within the framework of the APECOP project (Vanclooster et al, 2003).…”
Section: Covered Cropmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies, Figure 13. Daily rates mm day 1 of actual evapotranspiration (Etr), transpiration (Trans), soil water storage for the compartment 0-90 cm (SWC-WP) and groundwater recharge (GWR), plot 2 however, only 1 to 3-year periods of observed soil water contents and pressure heads were used (Diekkrüger et al, 1995;Eckersten et al, 1995;Heidmann et al, 2000;Musters and Bouten, 2000;Vanclooster and Boesten, 2000;Jacques et al, 2002). These periods are short in comparison with the 6 year period used in our study.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Differences In The Calculated Time-series Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, TDR systems have been used to validate soil water balance models in a number of field studies (e.g. Eckersten et al, 1995;Heidmann et al, 2000;Musters and Bouten, 2000;Vanclooster and Boesten, 2000;Jacques et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%