Abstract:As a green oxidant, permanganate has received considerable attention for the removal of micropollutants in drinking water treatment. To provide a better understanding of the oxidation of organic micropollutants with permanganate, the oxidation kinetics of 32 micropollutants were compiled. The pollutants include algal toxins, endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), and pharmaceuticals. The oxidation kinetics of micropollutants by permanganate were found to be first order with respect to both contaminant and perm… Show more
“…It reduces to ferric hydroxide which has coagulation/ flocculation properties, thus providing better efficiency. On the other hand, permanganate is relatively cheap, easy to handle (including the manganese dioxide sludge produced), stable, and does not form chlorinated or brominated by-products [33][34][35]. Peings et al investigated the oxidation mechanism of phenol by sulfatoferrate (VI) and compared it with permanganate and hypochlorite.…”
Phenolic compounds are priority pollutants with high toxicity even at low concentrations. In this review, the efficiency of both conventional and advanced treatment methods is discussed. The applicability of these treatments with phenol and some common derivatives is compared. Conventional treatments such as distillation, absorption, extraction, chemical oxidation, and electrochemical oxidation show high efficiencies with various phenolic compounds, while advanced treatments such as Fenton processes, ozonation, wet air oxidation, and photochemical treatment use less chemicals compared to the conventional ones but have high energy costs. Compared to physicochemical treatment, biological treatment is environmentally friendly and energy saving, but it cannot treat high concentration pollutants. Enzymatic treatment has proven to be the best way to treat various phenolic compounds under mild conditions with different enzymes such as peroxidases, laccases, and tyrosinases.
“…It reduces to ferric hydroxide which has coagulation/ flocculation properties, thus providing better efficiency. On the other hand, permanganate is relatively cheap, easy to handle (including the manganese dioxide sludge produced), stable, and does not form chlorinated or brominated by-products [33][34][35]. Peings et al investigated the oxidation mechanism of phenol by sulfatoferrate (VI) and compared it with permanganate and hypochlorite.…”
Phenolic compounds are priority pollutants with high toxicity even at low concentrations. In this review, the efficiency of both conventional and advanced treatment methods is discussed. The applicability of these treatments with phenol and some common derivatives is compared. Conventional treatments such as distillation, absorption, extraction, chemical oxidation, and electrochemical oxidation show high efficiencies with various phenolic compounds, while advanced treatments such as Fenton processes, ozonation, wet air oxidation, and photochemical treatment use less chemicals compared to the conventional ones but have high energy costs. Compared to physicochemical treatment, biological treatment is environmentally friendly and energy saving, but it cannot treat high concentration pollutants. Enzymatic treatment has proven to be the best way to treat various phenolic compounds under mild conditions with different enzymes such as peroxidases, laccases, and tyrosinases.
“…In chemical removal of pharmaceuticals, Fe and Mn play important roles as oxidants, reductants, or catalysts such as Fe(II) in Fenton processes (Kochi, 1967;Guan et al, 2010;Chelliapan and Sallis, 2013;Remucal and Ginder-Vogel, 2014;Segura et al, 2015). Chemical removal of pharmaceuticals in water treatment occurs through chemical oxidation via oxidizing agents (Fe(III), Fe(VI), Mn(IV), Mn(VII)), or chemical reduction via reducing agents like nZVI to degrade a compound or a group of compounds (Lee et al, 2009;Guan et al, 2010).…”
Section: Chemical Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical removal of pharmaceuticals in water treatment occurs through chemical oxidation via oxidizing agents (Fe(III), Fe(VI), Mn(IV), Mn(VII)), or chemical reduction via reducing agents like nZVI to degrade a compound or a group of compounds (Lee et al, 2009;Guan et al, 2010). In addition to conventional oxidation processes, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) including Fenton, photolysis, and ozonation are used to remove pharmaceuticals.…”
Section: Chemical Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1B) (Gao et al, 2012;He et al, 2012;Meerburg et al, 2012;Remucal and Ginder-Vogel, 2014;Tu et al, 2014;Li et al, 2015a). Permanganate (MnO 4 ¡ ) can be used to remove pharmaceuticals and other micropollutants containing electron-rich moieties (Guan et al, 2010;Hendratna, 2011). One study found that ciprofloxacin, lincomycin, and trimethoprim are removed in a second-order reaction from drinking water by Mn (VII), with rate constants of 0.61, 1.6, 3.6 M ¡1 s…”
Pharmaceuticals are detected at trace levels in waters. Their adverse effects on aquatic ecosystems and human health demand novel pharmaceutical removal technologies for treating wastewater effluents. Iron (Fe) or manganese (Mn) may play important roles in these new technologies since these metals are abundantly available at low costs and are known to contribute to organic conversions via physico-chemical, chemical, and biologically related processes. Few reviews describe and discuss Fe-or Mn-based technologies for the purpose to remove pharmaceuticals from water. Therefore, we review the current literature sorted into the three removal mechanisms, that is., through physico-chemical, chemical, and biological processes. The principals, performance, and influential parameters of these three types of technologies are described. Current and potential applications of these technologies are critically evaluated in order to identify advantages and challenges. In addition, the Fe-or Mn-based technologies which are currently not used but promising to further develop to remove pharmaceuticals cost efficiently are proposed.
“…The removal of phenols from wastewater can be carried out by adsorption [11][12], extraction [13], reverse osmosis, and nanofiltration [14][15], perflation [16], and membrane distillation [17]. It is also possible to use chemical oxidation processes with ferrate(VI) and permanganate(VII) [18][19]. Wet air oxidation (WAO) and catalytic wet air oxidation (CWAO) processes are also used.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.