Application of outranking methods to economic and financial justificaton of CIM systems

PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications

“…A comparison of ELECTRE III with PROMETHEE II for group decision-making Macharis et al (2004) A comparison of strengths and weaknesses of PROMETHEE and AHP Mahmoud and Garcia (2000) A comparison of Weighted Average (WA), PROMETHEE II, CP, ELECTRE II, and AHP Marinoni (2006) A comparison of AHP and PROMETHEE Olson (2001) A comparison of SMART, PROMETHEE II, and Centroid method Opricovic and Tzeng (2007) A comparison of the extended VIKOR method with TOPSIS, PROMETHEE, and ELECTRE Ozelkan and Duckstein (1996) A Comparison of PROMETHEE, GAIA, Multi-Criterion Q Analysis (MCQA-I, II, III), CP, and Cooperative Game Theory (CGT) Parreiras et al (2006) Utilizing SMARTS, PROMETHEE, and a fuzzy decision algorithm Parsaei et al (1993) Discussing PROMETHEE, ELECTRE, and ORESTE Pillai et al (1996) A comparison of ELECTRE-II, PROMETHEE-II, AHP, CP, and MCQA-II Pudenz et al (2002) Using Concordance analysis, UFT, PROMETHEE, and AHP Raju and Pillai (1999a) A comparison of ELECTRE-II, PROMETHEE-II, AHP, CP and EXPROM-II (Extension of PROMETHEE II in distance based environment) Raju and Pillai (1999b) A comparison of MAUT and Stochastic extension of PROMETHEE-II (STOPROM-II) Raju et al (2000) A comparison of ranking among PROMETHEE-II, EXPROM-II, ELECTRE-II and IV, and CP Raju and Kumar (2006) A comparison of DEA with discrete MCDM methods, PROMETHEE, and EXPROM Salminen et al (1998) A comparison of ELECTRE II1, PROMETHEE I, II, and SMART decision-aids Sarkis (2000) A comparison of DEA with PROMETHEE I, PROMETHEE II, ELECTRE III, and SMART Simon et al (2004) A comparison of PROMETHEE and HDT Simon et al (2005) A comparison of METEOR (METhod of Evaluation by ORder) and PROMETHEE Simon et al (2006) A comparison of METEOR and PROMETHEE results Urli and Beaudry (1995) Utilizing a modifications of the AHP and PROMETHEE methods van Huylenbroeck (1995) Combining the preference function approach of PROMETHEE and ELEETRE with the conflict analysis test of ORESTE Wang et al (2006) A hybrid integration of AHP and PROMETHEE Wang and Yang (2007) A hybrid integration of AHP and PROMETHEE methods has made a more realistic and promising decision than the stand-alone PROMETHEE. A number of papers in this regard combined PROMETHEE with AHP (Babic and Plazibat (1998); …”

“…Bayesian methodology to address uncertainties during equipment failures Chareonsuk et al (1997) Determining optimal preventive-maintenance intervals Incorporating a new model with two criteria Dagdeviren (2008) Selecting the best equipment milling machines -de Ranking the individuals in the population/assembly planning Original ordering Genetic Algorithm (OGA) Duvivier et al (2007) To determine the best strategy for scheduling nonpreemptable jobs Classical hill-climber meta-heuristic Keller et al (1991) To select an optimal formulation of a finishing product PCA Kolli et al (1992) Ranking alternatives for investment in advanced manufacturing technology - Martel and Aouni (1990) The problems of production planning Goal programming model Pandey and Kengpol (1995) To rank the best possible automated inspection devices for use in FMS and select them under technological and other constraints - Parsaei et al (1993) The justification of Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) systems - Parreiras et al (2006) To choose the final optimal solution/an inverse electromagnetic scattering problem - Petrovie et al (1988) Choosing the list of spare parts for maintenance purposes Spares cost minimization and reliability maximization integer programming Rekiek et al (2001) Ranking the individuals in the population/assembly planning Multi-objective grouping genetic algorithm Rekiek et al (2002) To select the best equipment combination for each station/the hybrid assembly line design Multi-objective grouping genetic algorithm/the branch-and-cut method Roux et al (2008) Ranking several scheduling strategies PlanOrdo framework/lexicographical sort Waeyenbergh et al (2004) The tactical choice of a predictive maintenance program for an automotive paint shop -PROMETHEE I, II and a Group Decision Support System (GDSS). Olson (2001) used PROMETHEE I and II to evaluate and to rank the abilities of eight baseball teams according to five criteria: hitting, power, speed, fielding, and pitching.…”

ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications

“…This includes works on PDA, robustness analysis and axiomatic analysis of ELECTRE. (2001) PDA in MCDA -Review Jahan et al (2010) MCDA applications to material selection problems Design Review Kabir et al (2013) MCDA for infrastructure management Structural Review Kiker et al (2005) MCDA applications for environmental decision making Environment Review Lahdelma et al (2000) MCDA in public environmental planning Environment Survey Lai et al (2008) MCDA for sustainability assessment of urban water systems Water Review Lendaris (1980) Tools for structural modeling -Survey Lootsma (1990) The French and the American school of MCDA -Overview Løken (2007) MCDA methods for energy planning purposes Energy Survey Malczewski (2006) Integrations of GIS and MCDA Various Review Mendoza and Martins (2006) MCDA applications in natural resource management Environment Review Moffett and Sarkar (2006) MCDA for the design of conservation area networks Environment Review Morrissey and Browne (2004) Models used in the area of municipal waste management Waste Review Mysiak (2006) Consistency of results of different MCDA methods Environment Survey Parsaei et al (1993) Discussion of MCDA for evaluation of CIM systems Manufacturing Survey Pohekar and Ramachandran (2004) MCDA applications for sustainable energy planning Energy Review Rehman and Romero (1993) MCDA in the analysis of agricultural systems Agriculture Survey Roy (1971) Decision making based on multiple objectives -Overview Roy and Vincke (1981) Outranking, MAUT-based and interactive MCDA methods -Overview Roy (1991) The outranking approach and ELECTRE methods -Overview Roy and Vanderpooten (1996b) 8 The European School of MCDA -Overview Sadok et al (2008) MCDA for the assessment of sustainability of alternative cropping systems Agriculture Survey Scott et al (2012) MCDA for bioenergy systems Energy / Environment Review Siskos et al (1984) Outranking and MAUT approaches -Overview Stewart (1992) The status of MCDA methods -Overview Tervonen and Figueira (2008) The See also the comment paper by …”

Factors for strategic evaluation of enterprise information technologies

“…; M = medium; L = low a References: a = Albayrakoglu (1996); b =Kleindorfer and Partovi (1990); c = Suresh and Kaparthi (1992); d =Khouja (1995); e = Sarkis (1997); f = Borenstein (1998); g =Padmanabhan (1989); h =Stam and Kuula (1991); i = Suresh (1991); j =Chandler (1982); k =Pandey and Kengpol (1995); l =Parsaei et al (1993); m =Suresh and Meredith (1985); n =Primrose (1991); o =Nelson (1986); p =Semich (1994) …”