“…However, because neither specific PLFA molecules or categories of PLFAs have been consistently assigned to particular ecological categories, it can be difficult to precisely ascribe PLFA biomarkers to community responses (Zelles, 1997;Zelles et al, 1992), thus motivating biochemical research to resolve this (Zelles, 1997). Examples of these correlations with varied ecological categories include: cy19:0 is indicative of a condition, microbial stress (Dickens and Anderson, 1999;Li et al, 2007); branched fatty acids are associated with a physiological trait, Gram positive microorganisms (Haubert et al, 2006;Lindahl et al, 1997;Nakamura et al, 2003), a physiological requirement, anaerobes (Keith-Roach et al, 2002;Nakamura et al, 2003), and a functional capability, metal reducers Schryver et al, 2006); and under specific growth conditions, branched odd-chain fatty acids (i15:0, a15:0, 15:1u6) may indicate narrower taxonomic groups of microorganisms, Desulfococcus or Desulfosarcina (Webster et al, 2006). Using a PLFA profile to describe the microbial community is also a daunting task, given that many PLFA biomarkers are poorly validated or may be valid only under particular conditions.…”