2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05228-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of modified electrospun nanofiber membranes with α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles in arsenate removal from aqueous media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative surface charge increased with the addition of GO and ZnO, which results in a high arsenate rejection rate and the membranes have a negative surface charge within the studied pH range, which is required for arsenate rejection. GP-2 and ZP-2 rejected 60 and 71% of arsenate, which is higher than the only reported result on electrospun membranes for arsenate removal by Bahmani et al [ 82 ], where GP-1 and ZP-1 demonstrated only 13 and 17% of arsenate rejection. This could be because of the porosity % and hydrophobic nature.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The negative surface charge increased with the addition of GO and ZnO, which results in a high arsenate rejection rate and the membranes have a negative surface charge within the studied pH range, which is required for arsenate rejection. GP-2 and ZP-2 rejected 60 and 71% of arsenate, which is higher than the only reported result on electrospun membranes for arsenate removal by Bahmani et al [ 82 ], where GP-1 and ZP-1 demonstrated only 13 and 17% of arsenate rejection. This could be because of the porosity % and hydrophobic nature.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…In the case of ZP-1 and 2, ZP-2 has higher water permeability, as ZP-2 has nearly 26% more porosity than ZP-1. Higher permeability is favorable for a higher arsenic rejection rate [ 82 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pervaporation experiments (PV) were carried out using the apparatus described in a previous paper [27] under the same conditions. A single measurement takes ten hours.…”
Section: Pervaporation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All proposed fillers have already been investigated in various fields, also in different aspects of membrane processes, e.g., hematite was applied for a removal of natural organic matter [ 23 ], as membrane filler in solid oxide fuel cells [ 24 ], as a catalyst in reactive membranes [ 25 ], ultrafiltration [ 26 ] and removal of heavy metals [ 27 ]. Magnetite was applied as membrane filler for pervaporation and membrane distillation [ 28 ], microfiltration [ 29 ], and a removal of heavy metals [ 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iron oxide is a compound material, largely found as hematite (α-Fe2O3), magnetite (Fe3O4), wüstite (Fe1 − xO), and maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) (Cornell and Schwertmann 2003), which has attracted attention as an adsorbent due to its ability to remove various types of heavy-metal ions (Bahmani et al 2019;Fayazi et al 2019;Sruthi et al 2018;Khan et al 2020). Recent studies have demonstrated that α-Fe2O3 has a high adsorption capability, which occurs through a chemisorption process involving the hydroxyl group on its surface (Singaraj et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%