2021
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture11020162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Body Condition Score from Liveweight Records of Mature Romney Ewes

Abstract: Body condition score (BCS) in sheep (Ovis aries) is a widely used subjective measure of the degree of soft tissue coverage. Body condition score and liveweight are statistically related in ewes; therefore, it was hypothesized that BCS could be accurately predicted from liveweight using machine learning models. Individual ewe liveweight and body condition score data at each stage of the annual cycle (pre-breeding, pregnancy diagnosis, pre-lambing and weaning) at 43 to 54 months of age were used. Nine machine le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall performance for all forecasting models is reported in Table 2. Notably, the machine learning models performed better than the regression models, where the RF and SVM models demonstrated the best overall prediction performance, similar to other livestock-related studies comparing the performance of multiple forecasting models [3,12,13]. Furthermore, the SVM outperformed the other models (Table 3) measured in terms of R 2 (0.731) and lower errors measured by RMSE (0.406) and MAE (0.284).…”
Section: Comparing Forecasting Modelssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The overall performance for all forecasting models is reported in Table 2. Notably, the machine learning models performed better than the regression models, where the RF and SVM models demonstrated the best overall prediction performance, similar to other livestock-related studies comparing the performance of multiple forecasting models [3,12,13]. Furthermore, the SVM outperformed the other models (Table 3) measured in terms of R 2 (0.731) and lower errors measured by RMSE (0.406) and MAE (0.284).…”
Section: Comparing Forecasting Modelssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…However, a great proportion of variability in BCS remained unaccounted for, leading to less robust models. Furthermore, in our previous study ( Semakula et al, 2021 b), machine learning classification algorithms were successfully (with up to 90% accuracy) used to predict BCS using LW predictors. However, these machine learning classification models were limited to a 3-point scale due to gross class imbalance in BCS data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%