Responding to demands for transformed farming practices requires new forms of knowledge. Given their scale and complexity, agricultural problems can no longer be solved by linear transfers in which technology developed by specialists passes to farmers by way of extension intermediaries. Recent research on alternative approaches has focused on the innovation systems formed by interactions between heterogeneous actors. Rather than linear transfer, systems theory highlights network facilitation as a specialized function. This paper contributes to our understanding of such facilitation by investigating the networks in which farmers discuss science. We report findings based on the study of a pastoral farming experiment collaboratively undertaken by a group of 17 farmers and five scientists. Analysis of prior contact and alter sharing between the group’s members indicates strongly tied and decentralized networks. Farmer knowledge exchanges about the experiment have been investigated using a mix of quantitative and qualitative methods. Network surveys identified who the farmers contacted for knowledge before the study began and who they had talked to about the experiment by 18 months later. Open-ended interviews collected farmer statements about their most valuable contacts and these statements have been thematically analysed. The network analysis shows that farmers talked about the experiment with 192 people, most of whom were fellow farmers. Farmers with densely tied and occupationally homogeneous contacts grew their networks more than did farmers with contacts that are loosely tied and diverse. Thematic analysis reveals three general principles: farmers value knowledge delivered by persons rather than roles, privilege farming experience, and develop knowledge with empiricist rather than rationalist techniques. Taken together, these findings suggest that farmers deliberate about science in intensive and durable networks that have significant implications for theorizing agricultural innovation. The paper thus concludes by considering the findings’ significance for current efforts to rethink agricultural extension.
Ewe size, pregnancy nutrition and pregnancy rank are known to affect the productive performance of ewes and their offspring. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of two nutritional regimens, from day 21 to day 140 of pregnancy, in singleton-and twin-bearing ewes of two different mean weights, taken from a single flock. The study included Large ewes offered Ad lib (Large-Ad lib, n= 151), Large ewes offered Maintenance (Large-Maintenance, n = 153), Small ewes offered Ad lib (Small-Ad lib, n = 155) and Small ewes offered Maintenance (Small-Maintenance, n = 153) that were either singleton-or twin-bearing. During the period day 21 to day 140 Maintenance and Ad lib feeding regimens included Large and Small ewes and singleton-and twin-bearing ewes. At days 1 and 140 of pregnancy Large ewes were heavier (P < 0.05) and of greater (P < 0.05) body condition than Small ewes. Similarly, at days 1 and 140 of pregnancy twin-bearing ewes were heavier (P < 0.05) than single-bearing ewes. At day 1 of pregnancy there was no difference in ewe liveweight and body condition scores between Maintenance and Ad lib-fed ewes, but by day 140 ewes in the Ad lib regimen were heavier (P < 0.05) and had greater (P < 0.05) body condition than Maintenance ewes. There was an interaction (P < 0.05) between ewe nutritional regimen and lamb birth rank for lamb birth weight such that twin lambs born to Maintenance regimen ewes were lighter (P < 0.05) than their counterparts born to Ad lib ewes (4.52 ± 0.06 versus 5.23 ± 0.06 kg respectively). This relationship was not observed in singletons. There was also an interaction (P < 0.05) between ewe size and nutritional regimen for lamb birthweight. Birth weights did not differ between lambs born to either Small or Large ewes on the Ad lib feeding regimen. However, lambs born to Small ewes on the Maintenance feeding regimen were lighter (P < 0.05) than their counterparts born to Large ewes (5.09 ± 0.07 versus 5.37 ± 0.07 kg respectively). At day 100 of lactation lambs born to Large ewes were heavier (P < 0.05) than those born to Small ewes (32.65 ± 0.37 versus 31.16 ± 0.35 kg respectively) and those born to Ad lib ewes were heavier (P < 0.05) than those born to Maintenance ewes (32.77 ± 0.37 versus 31.03 ± 0.36 kg respectively). This study shows that level of dam pregnancy nutrition has a greater effect on twin-born lambs than their singleton-born counterparts. Furthermore, the data suggests that the heavier liveweights at weaning of lambs born to Large ewes may not have compensated for their dams' greater nutritional requirements compared to their smaller counterparts.
Greater rates of genetic gain can be achieved by selecting animals born to younger parents. However, little is known about the lifetime performance of dual purpose ewes (Ovis aries) that are born to primiparous ewe lambs (8 to 9 months old at breeding). This experiment investigated the effect of being born from either a ewe lamb or mixed age dam as either a single or twin on the lifetime performance of ewe progeny. Lifetime performance was measured in terms of the life time live weights of the ewes, the weight and number of lambs born and weaned, the efficiency of production (kilograms of lamb weaned / predicted pasture intake (kgDM) of the ewes), and ewe survival. The study followed the lifetime production of 17 single and 41 twin female lambs born to mature ewes (M1 and M2, respectively), and 28 single and 29 twin lambs born to ewe lambs (L1 and L2, respectively). Over their lifetime L2 ewes were lighter (P<0.05) but had similar body condition scores to the other three ewe groups. There was no difference in average progeny weaning weight or total progeny litter weaning weights between groups. The M1 ewes had the greatest longevity (P<0.05) of the four groups. Even though L2 ewes were lighter than the other three groups, this was insufficient to increase their lifetime efficiency of production (kg lamb weaned/predicted pasture consumption), relative to the other groups. These results suggest farmers could select replacements born to ewe lambs without sacrificing animal production.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.