1987
DOI: 10.1016/0168-583x(87)90377-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of low energy charged particle beams for chlorine analysis in silicon samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be realized that the statistical uncertainty in the case of PIXE is mostly dictated by the signal to background ratio. The uncertainty values in the table reveal that the signal to background ratio is more advantageous for the low energy PIXE case (1.5 MeV H + ) as compared to the high energy case (2.5 MeV H + ), even if the ionization cross section is larger for the latter, in agreement with the literature [8]. The dependence of the signal to background ratio as a function of proton energy will be the subject of further investigations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be realized that the statistical uncertainty in the case of PIXE is mostly dictated by the signal to background ratio. The uncertainty values in the table reveal that the signal to background ratio is more advantageous for the low energy PIXE case (1.5 MeV H + ) as compared to the high energy case (2.5 MeV H + ), even if the ionization cross section is larger for the latter, in agreement with the literature [8]. The dependence of the signal to background ratio as a function of proton energy will be the subject of further investigations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It was demonstrated that the simultaneous and self-consistent analysis of both the RBS and PIXE spectra, through the NDF code [7], allows for a more accurate interpretation of depth and concentration profiles of multilayer samples as compared to the conventional analysis of the data. A few studies illustrate the suitability of PIXE to measure the thickness of thin films on Si substrates [8,9]. However, to our knowledge, no critical comparison exists between the sensitivity limits of PIXE and RBS to detect small amounts of medium-light elements deposited on a silicon substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus Low Energy PIXE, (LE-PIXE) using proton of energy lower than 1 MeV could enhance significantly the peak of the background ratio for light elements [9]. It is thus promising for the characterization of elements of Z < 20 in surface and near surface regions [8][9][10][11][12]. In order to improve the sensitivity of the PIXE technique, for the determination of Aluminum layer deposited on SiC substrate, we should consider different energies of the proton incidence particle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus low energy PIXE, (LE-PIXE) using proton of energy lower than 1 MeV could enhance significantly the peak of the background ratio for light elements [9]. It is thus promising for the characterization of elements of Z < 20 in surface and near surface regions [8][9][10][11][12]. In order to improve the sensitivity of the PIXE technique, for the determination of Aluminum layer deposited on Si substrate, we should consider different energies of the proton incidence particle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%