2018
DOI: 10.1111/jfpe.12974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of hot air‐assisted radio frequency as second stage drying method for mango slices

Abstract: This study applied hot air-assisted RF (HA-RF) as second stage drying method for mango slices.Hot-air drying was used as first stage drying to reduce moisture content to about 40% (w.b.), then HA-RF drying was applied as second stage drying to further reduce moisture content to 18% within 45 min with 4.5 cm sample thickness (hot air temperature: 60 C, electrode gap: 7.5 cm). The time for the two-stage drying process was about 5 hr, which was clearly lower than that of hot-air drying (8 hr) or vacuum drying (7 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showed hot-air-assisted RF drying reduced 30% of the drying time compared to solely hot air drying and maintained the good quality of carrot slices. Zhang et al [ 8 ] adopted a two-stage drying method to treat mango slices, which utilized hot air to dry mango slices to 40% (w.b.) in the first stage and then used hot-air-assisted RF heating (HA-RF) to continue to dry the product to 18% (w.b.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed hot-air-assisted RF drying reduced 30% of the drying time compared to solely hot air drying and maintained the good quality of carrot slices. Zhang et al [ 8 ] adopted a two-stage drying method to treat mango slices, which utilized hot air to dry mango slices to 40% (w.b.) in the first stage and then used hot-air-assisted RF heating (HA-RF) to continue to dry the product to 18% (w.b.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L * values decreased from 33.84 and 36.06 to 31.01 and 32.16, respectively, and a * values decreased from 30.15 and 31.59 to 28.02 and 26.95, respectively, when the plate spacing (from 80 mm to 100 mm) and vacuum degree (from 0.015 MPa to 0.035 MPa) gradually increased; however, the Δ E increased to 13.89 and 14.35. As the plate spacing and vacuum degree increased, the heating rate of the sample decreased and the environmental humidity in the RF drying differed from hot air drying, resulting in significant color difference changes [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. The total color difference Δ E of dried wolfberries increased from 10.53 to 12.71 when the hot air temperature increased from 55 °C to 60 °C, which was significantly higher than natural drying ( p < 0.05), but lower than single hot air drying ( p < 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three dried wolfberry samples under each group of different drying parameters were randomly selected for colorimetric analysis measured by a CIELab system, the reference of the illuminant was D65, SCI, and the degree of the observer was 10°. Three whole samples in each group were measured and color calculated as follows [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]: where Δ E denotes total chromatic aberration; L , a , and b represent the brightness value, red and green value, and yellow and blue value of fresh wolfberry samples, respectively; and L *, a *, and b * denote the brightness value, red and green value, and yellow and blue value of dried wolfberry products, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations