2011
DOI: 10.5152/akd.2011.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of healthy heart program in the two semi-rural areas in Eskişehir

Abstract: ÖZETAmaç: Çalışma Eskişehir'in yarı kırsal iki bölgesinde halkta kardiyovasküler hastalık (KVH) risk faktörleri konusunda, uygun davranış değişikliğini sağlamak ve bu konuda farkındalığı arttırmak amacıyla planlandı. Yöntemler: Bu çalışma yarı deneysel bir çalışma olup, iki aşamalı olarak planlandı. Çalışmanın ilk aşamasında evler ziyaret edildi. Müdahale ve kontrol bölgelerinde bireylere Framingham risk skorlarının (FRS) yazıldığı katılım formları dağıtıldı. Diğer eğitim materyalleri ise müdahale bölgesine da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study was designed based on the first-phase data from the semiexperimental intervention study the Eskisehir Healthy Hearts Project (EHHP). EHHP has been designed as both a community-based intervention and a research study [11]. It was described according to the STROBE statement (https://www.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study was designed based on the first-phase data from the semiexperimental intervention study the Eskisehir Healthy Hearts Project (EHHP). EHHP has been designed as both a community-based intervention and a research study [11]. It was described according to the STROBE statement (https://www.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were extracted from an intervention study, which is done in two phases between January 2008 and October 2009, of which study samples were from people in several semirural settlement areas in Eskisehir, which is located in the Central Anatolia Region of Turkey. The number of people aged 20 to 69 in the intervention group was 2.376 and the number in the control group was 4.681 [11].…”
Section: Data Source/measurementmentioning
confidence: 98%