2019
DOI: 10.3390/e21121199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Continuous Wavelet Transform and Convolutional Neural Network in Decoding Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface

Abstract: The motor imagery-based brain-computer interface (BCI) using electroencephalography (EEG) has been receiving attention from neural engineering researchers and is being applied to various rehabilitation applications. However, the performance degradation caused by motor imagery EEG with very low single-to-noise ratio faces several application issues with the use of a BCI system. In this paper, we propose a novel motor imagery classification scheme based on the continuous wavelet transform and the convolutional n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average results of this paper show 4-5% improvement over other articles that use the same data set. It's worth noting that in [60], Lee et al converted the CWT to convert EEG into 93 × 32 feature map, and then combined with the advantages of CNN in image processing to obtain a high classification accuracy (92.9%). The method in [60] is enlightening, but the time complexity of the model is higher.…”
Section: Analysis Of Classification Results Of Eeg Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average results of this paper show 4-5% improvement over other articles that use the same data set. It's worth noting that in [60], Lee et al converted the CWT to convert EEG into 93 × 32 feature map, and then combined with the advantages of CNN in image processing to obtain a high classification accuracy (92.9%). The method in [60] is enlightening, but the time complexity of the model is higher.…”
Section: Analysis Of Classification Results Of Eeg Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It's worth noting that in [60], Lee et al converted the CWT to convert EEG into 93 × 32 feature map, and then combined with the advantages of CNN in image processing to obtain a high classification accuracy (92.9%). The method in [60] is enlightening, but the time complexity of the model is higher. From the point of view of characteristic engineering, this paper extracts time domain feature of EEG signals, whose time complexity is O(1).…”
Section: Analysis Of Classification Results Of Eeg Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, deep learning models can generate data-driven features that may be computationally expensive to obtain using other available methods. While many data-driven spatial filtering methods are available [17, 90], identifying frequencies with relevant spectral power often requires either a brute force search or applying techniques such as wavelet convolution to compute power at several frequencies, increasing the size of an already high-dimensional dataset [91, 92]. In contrast, HTNet converges quickly and provides a low-dimensional feature representation in the spectral domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those factors pose a great challenge for decoding MI-based EEG signals effectively. Researchers have proposed numerous algorithms to process MI signals [ 11 , 12 ], including wavelet transform model [ 13 ], empirical mode decomposition [ 14 ], and common spatial pattern (CSP) [ 15 ]. Among them, CSP is the most popular method to extract features associated with different MI tasks [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%