2016
DOI: 10.5539/mas.v11n3p76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Central Force Optimization Method to Design Transient Protection Devices for Water Transmission Pipelines

Abstract: One of the major challenges in designing under pressure water transmission pipeline is the system protection against water-hammer pressures due to a pump trip. The best strategy is to use air-chamber; which imposes considerable costs. To mitigate the air-chamber volume, the use of air-inletvalvesis also suggested. Determination of air-chamber volume as well as the type and proper locations of air-inlet valves, aiming at the cost reduction, introduces an optimization problem. To solve this problem, this study e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To cater this problem, researchers for the last few decades use non-gradient, non-deterministic, and highly flexible meta-heuristic-based techniques to obtain the solution for OPF without trapping into local minima due to the advancement in computer technologies [1]. To date, the various meta-heuristic methods that have been used to solve OPF are portrayed in [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. Generally, the meta-heuristic approaches are categorized into four major classes:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To cater this problem, researchers for the last few decades use non-gradient, non-deterministic, and highly flexible meta-heuristic-based techniques to obtain the solution for OPF without trapping into local minima due to the advancement in computer technologies [1]. To date, the various meta-heuristic methods that have been used to solve OPF are portrayed in [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. Generally, the meta-heuristic approaches are categorized into four major classes:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SI-based methods include particle swarm, artificial bee colony [31], firefly algorithm [32], chaotic krill heard [33], backtracking search algorithm [34], efficient evolutionary algorithm [35], faster evolutionary algorithm [36], search algorithm [37], differential evolution algorithm [38], multi-hive bee foraging algorithm [39], etc. Moreover, the affine arithmetic method [40], the knowledge-based framework human learning To date, the various meta-heuristic methods that have been used to solve OPF are portrayed in [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. Generally, the meta-heuristic approaches are categorized into four major classes:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jung et al [31] integrated both GA and PSO simultaneously with hydraulic transient analysis to discover the best location and combination of transient protection devices in a pipe network. Similarly, Moghaddas et al [32] compared central force optimization (CFO) and GA for optimizing the pipeline protection cost of a water transfer project considering hydraulic transients induced during pump maneuver. They optimized the volume of the air chamber along with the location and type of air-inlet valves with minimum cost as the objective function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%