2000 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37100)
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2000.860197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of ARMA modeling to the improvement of weight estimations in fruit sorting and grading machinery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantages of electronic weight sizers over mechanical sizers, according to Studman (1999) are: it is easier to recalibrate the machine for different size groups because it is not necessary to adjust all the ejection points individually; the electronic weight grader can achieve a more accurate weight measurement; and higher operating speeds are possible. Frances et al (2000), using an electronic weight sizer, processed a 150-g weight pattern piece 100 times at a speed of 16 fruits per second, obtaining a coefficient of variation (CV) of 0.34%. Disadvantages of the electronic weight sizer, according to Studman (1999), include the cost of the equipment and the need of personnel trained in electronics and computing.…”
Section: Fruit Weight Direct Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of electronic weight sizers over mechanical sizers, according to Studman (1999) are: it is easier to recalibrate the machine for different size groups because it is not necessary to adjust all the ejection points individually; the electronic weight grader can achieve a more accurate weight measurement; and higher operating speeds are possible. Frances et al (2000), using an electronic weight sizer, processed a 150-g weight pattern piece 100 times at a speed of 16 fruits per second, obtaining a coefficient of variation (CV) of 0.34%. Disadvantages of the electronic weight sizer, according to Studman (1999), include the cost of the equipment and the need of personnel trained in electronics and computing.…”
Section: Fruit Weight Direct Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weighing subsystems used in fruit sorting machines usually use load cells as sensors (Frances et al, 2000). In this case we used a load cell manufactured by Utilcell (2011), specifically the 260 model, which consists of a double bending beam load cell with viscous damping, of 5 kg capacity, accurate to 4,000 divisions OIML R60 class C (O.I.M.L.…”
Section: Weighing Subsystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the weighing sensor and transmitter are equivalent to a single control system, the output weighing signals are the step responses of this system (Frances et al, 2000). In debugging process, the weighing signals present oscillations before reaching stable with the transmitter filter time 0 ms, but shown as figure 1 with transmitter filter time 10 ms. System order is the inherent attribute which keeps invariant while the transmitter filter time and the weighing speed are changing.…”
Section: Dynamic Weighing Signal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%