2009
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsp105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of a generalized additive model (GAM) to reveal relationships between environmental factors and distributions of pelagic fish and krill: a case study in Sendai Bay, Japan

Abstract: Murase, H., Nagashima, H., Yonezaki, S., Matsukura, R., and Kitakado, T. 2009. Application of a generalized additive model (GAM) to reveal relationships between environmental factors and distributions of pelagic fish and krill: a case study in Sendai Bay, Japan. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66: 1417–1424. A generalized additive model (GAM) was applied to fishery-survey data to reveal the influences of environmental factors on the distribution patterns of Japanese anchovy (Engraulis japonicus), sand lance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An interesting feature of GAM is that it allows determination of the shape of the response curves from the data instead of fitting an a priori parametric model, making it data-driven instead of model driven [57]. GAMs have been widely applied to investigate nonlinear relationships between dependent and non-explanatory variables in various fields of study such as plant and aquatic ecology (e.g., [58]) and water quality (e.g., [59]), as well as for nonlinear relationships among biotic and bon-biotic variables in environmental settings due to complex interactions between environmental factors. Many studies have identified nonlinear relationships among components of forest ecosystems (e.g., [3,50,[60][61][62][63][64][65]).…”
Section: Linear and Nonlinear Model Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting feature of GAM is that it allows determination of the shape of the response curves from the data instead of fitting an a priori parametric model, making it data-driven instead of model driven [57]. GAMs have been widely applied to investigate nonlinear relationships between dependent and non-explanatory variables in various fields of study such as plant and aquatic ecology (e.g., [58]) and water quality (e.g., [59]), as well as for nonlinear relationships among biotic and bon-biotic variables in environmental settings due to complex interactions between environmental factors. Many studies have identified nonlinear relationships among components of forest ecosystems (e.g., [3,50,[60][61][62][63][64][65]).…”
Section: Linear and Nonlinear Model Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with an LM, GAMs are data-driven rather than model-driven, and GAMs allow determination of the shape of the response curves from the data instead of fitting an a priori parametric model, which is limited in its available shape of response [27]. GAMs have been widely used in various fields, such as species distribution [28][29][30][31][32][33], plant ecology [34][35][36], and water quality dynamics [21,37,38]. For example, Murase et al [29] applied GAMs to fishery-survey data to reveal the influences of environmental factors, including surface water temperature, salinity, chlorophyll, near-seabed water temperature, salinity, and depth, on the distribution patterns of Japanese anchovy, sand lance, and krill.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are generally statistical models that are constructed using observed habitat-organism relationships. Various statistical algorithms, including generalized linear models, generalized additive models, and maximum entropy models, are used to predict the distribution of marine organisms (Jones et al 2012;Murase et al 2009;Pittman and Brown 2011;Reiss et al 2011). Although SD models are powerful tools for evaluating the spatial distribution of organisms in diverse habitats, they are usually empirical and most of them cannot provide mechanistic predictions.…”
Section: Species Distribution Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%