2016
DOI: 10.1364/boe.7.002295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability, usability, and limitations of murine embryonic imaging with optical coherence tomography and optical projection tomography

Abstract: Abstract:We present an analysis of imaging murine embryos at various embryonic developmental stages (embryonic day 9.5, 11.5, and 13.5) by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and optical projection tomography (OPT). We demonstrate that while OCT was capable of rapid highresolution live 3D imaging, its limited penetration depth prevented visualization of deeper structures, particularly in later stage embryos. In contrast, OPT was able to image the whole embryos, but could not be used in vivo because the embryos … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 35 To image deep inside the lens and visualize the formation of the cold cataract, we utilized a commercial swept source OCT (SS-OCT) system (OCS1310V2, Thorlabs Inc., New Jersey) with a central wavelength of 1300 nm, bandwidth of , and sweep rate of 200 kHz. 36 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 35 To image deep inside the lens and visualize the formation of the cold cataract, we utilized a commercial swept source OCT (SS-OCT) system (OCS1310V2, Thorlabs Inc., New Jersey) with a central wavelength of 1300 nm, bandwidth of , and sweep rate of 200 kHz. 36 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, for early stage embryos (e.g. E9.5), a depth of field of a few millimeters is sufficient for whole-body embryo imaging [12,39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously compared the performance of OCT and OPT for imaging murine embryos, where we observed similar results that OCT was unable to wholly image embryos beyond E9.5. OPT was able to image entire later stage embryos (up to E13.5) but requires a lengthy clearing and fixation procedure, while OCT can perform live imaging [39]. Although live OPT imaging of murine embryos has been demonstrated, only a limb bud was successfully imaged [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OPT can operate using either absorption/scattering of the sample (transmission OPT, tOPT) or fluorescence (emission OPT, eOPT) to generate image contrast. The use of OPT has been reported widely, and applications include the visualization of the 3D anatomy of mouse embryos (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27), zebrafish (21,24,(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34), drosophila (35)(36)(37)(38), plants (39,40), C.elegans (41), animal organs (22,27,(42)(43)(44) and other mesoscopic samples (45)(46)(47). Although major improvements in resolution (48,49), acquisition time (31), field of view (FOV) (21,40) and compatibility with other imaging techniques (22,28,50) have been made, most OPT applications require advanced technical expertise, expensive equipment, and bespoke software for reconstruction.…”
Section: D Imaging | Opt | Projection Tomography | Lungs | Open-sourmentioning
confidence: 99%