2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2016.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition to Japanese children: A study of the Age Band 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
67
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
10
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, theoretically and empirically, the MABC-2 test and the specified situation items confirm the representation of the aspects hypostasized for band 2 under analysis. Recently, Kita et al (2016) found good factorial validity for the original model proposed by Henderson et al (2007) in a study of 132 Japanese children (84 boys and 48 girls) between 7.0 and 10.8 years of age, in which each of the three components had its constituent items.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, theoretically and empirically, the MABC-2 test and the specified situation items confirm the representation of the aspects hypostasized for band 2 under analysis. Recently, Kita et al (2016) found good factorial validity for the original model proposed by Henderson et al (2007) in a study of 132 Japanese children (84 boys and 48 girls) between 7.0 and 10.8 years of age, in which each of the three components had its constituent items.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of the representativeness of the content has contributed to sustain the MABC-2 factorial organization in this sample. Therefore, we chose to evaluate, through confirmatory factor analysis, the same factorial structure (Table 2), as observed in other papers (Kita et al, 2016). Therefore, we tried to compare the psychometric indicators of the original factorial organization to the alternative organization proposed by Schulz et al (2011), which suggested the exclusion of one item (Drawing trail 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Esta avaliação motora tem sido utilizada em diversas nacionalidades para identificar crianças com dificuldade significativa de movimento, como na China (CHANG; YU, 2016), Japão (KITA et al, 2016), Holanda (NIEMEIJER et al, 2015) e Brasil (VALENTINI et al, 2014). Trata-se de um teste motor com três conjuntos de tarefas (destreza manual, lançar e receber e equilíbrio), para as faixas etárias específicas: faixa um (3 a 6 anos); faixa dois (7 a 10 anos) e faixa três (11 a 16 anos).…”
Section: Instrumentosunclassified
“…in European and Asian countries. [6][7][8][9] Although the MABC-2 has been assessed for validity in the Brazilian population, 10 construct validity was not contemplated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%