2013
DOI: 10.1097/icl.0b013e31828ca174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability of Contact Angle Techniques Used in the Analysis of Contact Lenses, Part 1

Abstract: No single contact angle technique fully characterizes the wettability of a material surface, and the application of complimenting methods allows increased characterization. At present, there is not an ISO standard method designed for soft materials. It is important that each contact angle technique has a standard protocol, as small protocol differences between laboratories often contribute to a variety of published data that are not easily comparable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(69 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure presents the CAs of water droplet sample. Based on the obtained results, the CA between water and polymers was less than 90°, which indicates a good hydrophilicity behavior …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Figure presents the CAs of water droplet sample. Based on the obtained results, the CA between water and polymers was less than 90°, which indicates a good hydrophilicity behavior …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…As previously explained in the introduction, each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages, and different techniques, individual protocols, and data interpretation influence the CA obtained, make it difficult to compare data. 25 For this reason, this study was intended to evaluate the differences between the CA obtained when removing the lens from the blister and after immersed in different solutions, and so comparisons will be made only with the values obtained in this study. The physiological benefits of using Si-Hy lenses compared to traditional (low oxygen transmissibility) hydrogel lenses are well documented but CL-related dryness and discomfort still exist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CA analysis of hydrogel materials is commonly performed using sessile drop, captive bubble, or Wilhelmy plate. 25 According to the literature review of Campbell D. et al that present the CA terminology, methodology, and analysis, each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages. 25 The CA determines the angle at which a liquid/vapor interface meets a solid surface and, in the case of this study, estimates how a lens may interact with CL solutions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…using a high-tech optical camera, the angle that was created between the baseline of the drop (solidliquid interface) and the tangent (liquid-air surface) was determined using Young-Laplace-Fit method [18,19].…”
Section: Surface Contact Anglementioning
confidence: 99%