2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appliance labeling and consumer heterogeneity: A discrete choice experiment in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of EE as an attribute on consumers' appliance choices seems to be lower than attributes such as price, capacity and brand. This has also been found in other EE-related publications in Spain [16,24,54] and elsewhere [11,27,33,55]. Another important issue is the apparent misunderstanding wherein the concept of EE is confused with energy consumption and savings, as also shown in de Ayala et al [16] and Waechter et al [56].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The effect of EE as an attribute on consumers' appliance choices seems to be lower than attributes such as price, capacity and brand. This has also been found in other EE-related publications in Spain [16,24,54] and elsewhere [11,27,33,55]. Another important issue is the apparent misunderstanding wherein the concept of EE is confused with energy consumption and savings, as also shown in de Ayala et al [16] and Waechter et al [56].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…They were also in the opinion that more education on choosing energy-saving electrical appliances is necessary (Zha et al, 2020). The negative sign of price with 1% significance level is as expected since preference or utility for a given choice will be lower when the cost of choice increases, thus implying the probability of consumers choosing alternative option is reduced when the prince increases (Jain et al, 2018). Therefore, an increase in the price of table fan reduces students' WTP due to the lower utility cost.…”
Section: Choice Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…It has been pointed out that to calculate the costs and benefits of alternatives, a consumer requires a certain level of literacy and a familiarity with numeracy (Blasch et al 2019). Energy labelling and star ratings are two mechanisms that help increase energy literacy levels, apart from conducting programmes and implementing non-price-based policies (Jain et al 2018a;2018b). Further, even in cases where cognitive barriers are not significant, it has been argued that consumers and producers simply do not make use of the available information and thus underestimate the hidden costs of their actions (Kahneman 2003;Allcott and Greenstone 2012).…”
Section: Non-price Based Interventions: Insights From Behavioural Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar context, several studies have shown how energy labels allow consumers to easily process information and make informed choices by taking into consideration the energy efficiency of household appliance models (Sammer and Wüstenhagen 2006;Shen and Saijo 2009;Jain et al 2018a;2018b).…”
Section: Non-price Based Interventions: Insights From Behavioural Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%