2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2310608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apple's Changing Business Model: What Should the World's Richest Company Do with All Those Profits?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is severely shrinking its own pool of customers (Stout, 2012). And some companies are buying back their own shares in order to increase shareholder value at the expense of long term investment in the company (see for example, Lazonick et al, 2013). Non-financial companies have been accruing increasing proportions of their profits from financial activity (Clegg et al, 2011).…”
Section: Financialisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is severely shrinking its own pool of customers (Stout, 2012). And some companies are buying back their own shares in order to increase shareholder value at the expense of long term investment in the company (see for example, Lazonick et al, 2013). Non-financial companies have been accruing increasing proportions of their profits from financial activity (Clegg et al, 2011).…”
Section: Financialisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have highlighted the potential for financialized business models to distort corporate behaviour in particular ways. For example, Lazonick, Mazzucato, and Tulum (2013) have highlighted how Apple's business model produces extreme profitability and consequent distribution to shareholders which, they argue, is unjustified by any argument about risk or investment.…”
Section: Alternative Framing Through Critical Business Model Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between the two corresponded to that depicted in the upper right-hand quadrant of Table 2. Apple was the focal firm in the global value chains for its products, and the power relationship between Apple and Foxconn was heavily skewed in favor of the US firm (Bergvall-Ka˚reborn & Howcroft, 2013;Froud, Johal, Leaver, & Williams, 2012;Haslam, Tsitianis, Andersson, & Yin, 2013;Heracleous, 2013;Lazonick, Mazzucato, & Tulum, 2013;Montgomerie & Roscoe, 2013). Apple was thus able to move progressively from simply purchasing components from Foxconn, to outsourcing the manufacture and assembly of many of its products to the Taiwanese firm whilst still retaining control over the value chain, and crucially capturing most of the added value from the value chains (Jacobides, Knudsen, & Augier, 2006).…”
Section: Stage 1 (2000à2007): the Origins Of The Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%