2002
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.116.5.807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appetitive conditioning-induced plasticity is expressed during paradoxical sleep in the medial geniculate, but not in the lateral amygdala.

Abstract: This study examined whether neurons in the medial division of the medial geniculate (MGm) and the dorsal part of the lateral amygdala (LAd) express learning-induced plasticity in paradoxical sleep (PS) after appetitive conditioning, as they do in PS after fear conditioning. Rats received tone-food pairings in 3 sessions. After each session, the tone was presented at a nonawakening intensity during PS. Multiunit activity was simultaneously recorded in MGm and LAd. During waking, increases in tone-evoked dischar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cue-induced firing patterns during SWS were not investigated in these studies. Increased neural responses were also observed after cue reexposure during REM sleep in the medial geniculate body of the auditory thalamus and, for aversive cues, in the lateral amygdala (542,543,755). Taken together, these studies by Hennevin's group indicate that learning-induced plasticity can be reexpressed by cueing during REM sleep, whereas expression of conditioned responses was not consistently observed during SWS (541).…”
Section: Reactivating Memories During Sleep By Cueingmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Cue-induced firing patterns during SWS were not investigated in these studies. Increased neural responses were also observed after cue reexposure during REM sleep in the medial geniculate body of the auditory thalamus and, for aversive cues, in the lateral amygdala (542,543,755). Taken together, these studies by Hennevin's group indicate that learning-induced plasticity can be reexpressed by cueing during REM sleep, whereas expression of conditioned responses was not consistently observed during SWS (541).…”
Section: Reactivating Memories During Sleep By Cueingmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…REM replay is much less studied than NREM replay, but its occurrence is supported not only by place cell recordings [72] and conditioning work in rats [73], but also by PET [74] and EEG studies in humans [75]. While Non-REM replay occurs in a temporally compressed form, around 6-20 times faster than the real experience [76], replay in REM sleep is not compressed to this extent, and instead more closely reflects the real time involved in doing the task.…”
Section: Box 2 Memory Replay In Sleepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies inactivated the amygdala with muscimol, which has physiological effects for several millimetres around the injection site 81 . On the other hand, in an appetitive task, the MGm develops strong plasticity in waking and continues to express it during paradoxical sleep, whereas the basolateral amygdala (BLA) exhibits weaker plasticity and does not show plasticity during paradoxical sleep 82 . The authors conclude that the amygdala is more involved in strong emotional states, such as in aversive conditioning, whereas the MGm signals the importance of the CS for both aversive and appetitive conditioning.…”
Section: Loci Of Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%