2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Memory Replay in Sleep Boosts Creative Problem-Solving

Abstract: Creative thought relies on the reorganisation of existing knowledge. Sleep is known to be important for creative thinking, but there is a debate about which sleep stage is most relevant, and why. We address this issue by proposing that rapid eye movement sleep, or 'REM', and non-REM sleep facilitate creativity in different ways. Memory replay mechanisms in non-REM can abstract rules from corpuses of learned information, while replay in REM may promote novel associations. We propose that the iterative interleav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
111
1
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
9
111
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Because our recordings began after animals had received considerable experience with the maze environment during the pre-training phase, we may have captured a set of operational demands unlike initial learning. To reconcile our finding of generalization with previous reports of orthogonalization, we propose that both mechanisms act on the organization of memory but at different timescales: orthogonalization dominates an early, fast encoding process which emphasizes the uniqueness of current experiences, while generalization acts as a slower refinement of existing memory representations by finding statistical regularities; both of these processes likely involve regions outside the hippocampus (Ghosh & Gilboa, 2013; Koster et al, 2018; Lewis, Knoblich, & Poe, 2018). This distinction suggests that it is more appropriate for our work to be framed in terms of long-term mechanisms of memory stability, rather than those which are relevant to shaping the initial learning and encoding process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Because our recordings began after animals had received considerable experience with the maze environment during the pre-training phase, we may have captured a set of operational demands unlike initial learning. To reconcile our finding of generalization with previous reports of orthogonalization, we propose that both mechanisms act on the organization of memory but at different timescales: orthogonalization dominates an early, fast encoding process which emphasizes the uniqueness of current experiences, while generalization acts as a slower refinement of existing memory representations by finding statistical regularities; both of these processes likely involve regions outside the hippocampus (Ghosh & Gilboa, 2013; Koster et al, 2018; Lewis, Knoblich, & Poe, 2018). This distinction suggests that it is more appropriate for our work to be framed in terms of long-term mechanisms of memory stability, rather than those which are relevant to shaping the initial learning and encoding process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…It is unclear how exactly those objectNEs jump up into activity. A common explanation is that objectNEs, primed by previous activity or current sensory or subcortical stimulation, activate spontaneously, triggered by the ponto-geniculo-occipital (PGO) waves that characterize REM sleep 29 . In the words of Hobson & McCarley, the neocortex is making "the best of a bad job in producing even partially coherent dream imagery from the relatively noisy signals sent up from the brain stem" 30 .…”
Section: Prefrontal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical learning requires adequate consolidation and generalisation over time, a process known to be supported by sleep (Albouy, King, Maquet, & Doyon, 2013;Durrant et al, 2016;Durrant, Taylor, Cairney, & Lewis, 2011;Lewis, Knoblich, & Poe, 2018;Lutz, Wolf, Hubner, Born, & Rauss, 2018). Behaviourally, sleep strengthens predictive sequence coding (Lutz et al, 2018), including the acquisition and prediction of auditory statistical regularities (Durrant, Cairney, & Lewis, 2013;Durrant et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%