2020
DOI: 10.21614/chirurgia.115.3.348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appendiceal Diverticular Disease: A 10-year Retrospective Study of Cases from Tertiary Hospitals in Western Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found our DDA patients' mean age was 34.4 years; 40% of the patients were in the second decade of their life. The mean WBC of our patients was 13.5, but lower rates have been reported in the literature [3,7,9]. The incidence of appendiceal diverticulitis detected 0.63 in our study, consistent with national and international studies [3,4,10,11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We found our DDA patients' mean age was 34.4 years; 40% of the patients were in the second decade of their life. The mean WBC of our patients was 13.5, but lower rates have been reported in the literature [3,7,9]. The incidence of appendiceal diverticulitis detected 0.63 in our study, consistent with national and international studies [3,4,10,11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Elective appendectomy is recommended for incidentally detected DDA due to the high risk of diverticulitis, perforation, and development of appendiceal malignancy risk [7,8,11,15]. Our study has certain limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite that AD is a pathological diagnosis, clinically and radiologically it can mimic acute appendicitis (AA) [ 1 , 2 ]. Toh et al [ 3 ] has reported a remarkable increase of malignancy rate and complications such as perforation in association of the AD. Here we report a case of AD initially diagnosed as a case of appendicular mucocele in elderly patient with background of malignancy in preoperative work-up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%