1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00662807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparent wave function collapse caused by scattering

Abstract: Some experimental implications of the recent progress on wave function collapse are calculated. Exact results are derived for the center-of-mass wave function collapse caused by random scatterings and applied to a range of specific examples. The results show that recently proposed experiments to measure the GRW effect are likely to fail, since the effect of naturally occurring scatterings is of the same form as the GRW effect but generally much stronger. The same goes for attempts to measure the collapse cause… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
128
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
128
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For them the shrinkage of the off-diagonal matrix elements of ρ(r, r ) is a consequence of small scatterings, which according to them and to [4], are sufficient to reduce the off-diagonal values. But one should bear in mind that the thermal wavelength has nothing to do with external scatterings (e.g., the movement of matter on the star Sirius, as mentioned by Borel [7]).…”
Section: The Thermal Statementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For them the shrinkage of the off-diagonal matrix elements of ρ(r, r ) is a consequence of small scatterings, which according to them and to [4], are sufficient to reduce the off-diagonal values. But one should bear in mind that the thermal wavelength has nothing to do with external scatterings (e.g., the movement of matter on the star Sirius, as mentioned by Borel [7]).…”
Section: The Thermal Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demonstration of Tegmark [4] claims not to use this assumption and has been quoted as if it were correct. Unfortunately it is not, and it violates energy conservation.…”
Section: Formal Scattering Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations