2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-018-1662-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparent-Depth Effects of the Dynamic Failure of Thick Hard Rock Strata on the Underlying Coal Mass During Underground Mining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 9, the overlying strata of the working face present stepped plastic failure, the upper rock mass of the stepped failure line (white mark line in the figure) is complete, and there is no macroscopic failure such as mining fracture. e plastic failure area of the overlying strata presents a "hump shape," and the "hump shape" plastic failure pattern gradually transfers to the lower part with the increase of coal seam dip angle [35].…”
Section: Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 9, the overlying strata of the working face present stepped plastic failure, the upper rock mass of the stepped failure line (white mark line in the figure) is complete, and there is no macroscopic failure such as mining fracture. e plastic failure area of the overlying strata presents a "hump shape," and the "hump shape" plastic failure pattern gradually transfers to the lower part with the increase of coal seam dip angle [35].…”
Section: Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the overburden contains hard roofs in ETCSM, breakages and instabilities in the multi-layer structures result in ground pressures of varying degrees. 1,2 In particular, breakages and instabilities in high-position hard roofs (HHRs) result in strong ground pressure behavior (SGPB) and support failures in the working face and entry owing to their large caving span and hanging area ( Figure 1). [3][4][5] These hazards represent a severe danger to safe production and pose a new challenge to achieving hard roof control in ETCSM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19] At present, the most commonly used technologies are coal pillar supports, gob-side entry retention, goaf filling, a spatiotemporal coupling fracturing method using a nonexplosive expansion material, water injection to weaken the roof, presplitting blasting, deep hole blasting, energy-cavity blasting, and hydraulic slitting. 2,14,15,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] The main ideas can be summarized as follows: (a) maintain the stability of the hard roof and support the stope space; (b) weaken the hard roof and reduce its rock mass strength; and (iii) transfer the stress or release the strain energy to eliminate the source of SGP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water-conducted fracture zone (WCFZ) consists of the caved zone and fractured zone and can be considered plasticized [12]. Hence, its height is important for the safety of underground production and the surface ecological environment (Guo et al 2018; [13][14][15][16]). The height of WCFZ depends on the mining method, mining height, advancing speed, panel width, overburden strength, stratum structure, and geological structure [2,[17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%