1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf01032338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparatus to determine static and dynamic elastic moduli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unjacketed modulus K s is not significantly influenced by w/c ratio, but this influence is more significant on the modulus K φ which shows an increasing trend with w/c ratio. Figure It is well-known that the dynamic elastic properties of geomaterials, particularly at saturated state, are significantly higher than the static ones [63][64] [65][66][67] [68]. Different empirical relations between the dynamic and the static elastic moduli of geomaterials are proposed in the literature.…”
Section: Effect Of Water-to-cement Ratio On Poroelastic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unjacketed modulus K s is not significantly influenced by w/c ratio, but this influence is more significant on the modulus K φ which shows an increasing trend with w/c ratio. Figure It is well-known that the dynamic elastic properties of geomaterials, particularly at saturated state, are significantly higher than the static ones [63][64] [65][66][67] [68]. Different empirical relations between the dynamic and the static elastic moduli of geomaterials are proposed in the literature.…”
Section: Effect Of Water-to-cement Ratio On Poroelastic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rock mechanical properties are not directly obtained from logging tools but can be derived from well log data or obtained from laboratory test (Ameen et al 2009). The properties determined from well log data are called dynamic properties while those obtained from stress-strain laboratory measurements are referred to as static constant (Howarth 1984). In situ log measurements represent continuous profile of the formation strength (Hsieh et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, tensile stress creates in the center. Eventually, the rock specimen will split into segments at failure [1,12,[17][18][19].…”
Section: Static Methods (Direct)mentioning
confidence: 99%