2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.10.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparatus for investigation of evaporation at free liquid–vapour interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2a. While the evaporation effect was dominant in this case, more heat was absorbed from liquid than vapor due to the big thermal conductivity in liquid, which resulted in a temperature discontinuity with the interfacial temperature in vapor greater than that in the liquid by 0.28 • C. It is noted that same temperature discontinuity trends were both found in Popov's (2005) and Ward's (2001) experiments, which they inferred that condensation took place at the interface to release heat to the vapor phase after long-time stabilizing due to the relatively low liquid temperature. While in present experiments, the liquid temperatures were controlled to be always bigger than the vapor temperature, which means no condensation occurring at the vapor-liquid interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…2a. While the evaporation effect was dominant in this case, more heat was absorbed from liquid than vapor due to the big thermal conductivity in liquid, which resulted in a temperature discontinuity with the interfacial temperature in vapor greater than that in the liquid by 0.28 • C. It is noted that same temperature discontinuity trends were both found in Popov's (2005) and Ward's (2001) experiments, which they inferred that condensation took place at the interface to release heat to the vapor phase after long-time stabilizing due to the relatively low liquid temperature. While in present experiments, the liquid temperatures were controlled to be always bigger than the vapor temperature, which means no condensation occurring at the vapor-liquid interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Studies of evaporation were started by Hertz 1 and subsequently a large number of experimental, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] theoretical, [15][16][17][18][19][20] and molecular simulation [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] works as well as review articles [30][31][32] and books [33][34][35][36][37] appeared of which only some are cited here. Despite these efforts it still seems that the experimental findings diverge from the existing molecular modelling [17][18][19][20] and simulation [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further discussion of that paper 27 is given below. Stimulated by the ideas of Bošnjaković 15 on the heat transport from the bulk liquid region to the interface, experimental studies [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] were made to determine the length L n and the temperature drop ∆T = T l − T l i . A major difference between experimental work and molecular model calculations, [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] however, is the length of the non-thermostated region L n .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As to the analysis of thermocapillary convection coupling with evaporation effect in a horizontal thin liquid layer, only preliminary numerical study was performed [18]. Recently, in a special experimental environment, researchers found a big temperature jump at a spherical evaporating interface [19,20]. Yet there are no relevant papers regarding more common experiments in a plane thin evaporating layer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%