2018
DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20182017113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aplicação de uma prova brasileira de vocabulário expressivo em crianças falantes do Português Europeu

Abstract: Objective to investigate the performance of European Portuguese children in a Brazilian test of expressive vocabulary, seeking to identify differences between age groups and gender, and to verify its applicability in this population. Methods the sample consisted of 150 typical developed children, of both genders, between the ages of 5 and 6. All children attended public schools in the north area of Portugal. To assess the semantic performance, the expressive vocabulary sub-test of the language test (ABFW) was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lexical fields that presented the worst performance in this study coincided with those found in previous studies: clothes (27) , places (17,(27)(28)(29) and foods (17,27) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The lexical fields that presented the worst performance in this study coincided with those found in previous studies: clothes (27) , places (17,(27)(28)(29) and foods (17,27) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The categories that obtained better performance, that is, those that showed to be more consolidated differed, to a certain extent, from the reference results of the ABFW test, for the same age groups, since the categories that presented greater percentage of designation of the usual word, referentially, were clothing, foods, places and shapes and colors (16,27) . The conceptual field shapes and colors was the only one that was among the categories that presented better results, both in this study and in the reference study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations