2012
DOI: 10.1080/21658005.2012.674661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aphid species of genusMacrosiphumPasserini, 1860 (Hemiptera, Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae) inhabitingKnautiaL. in Belarus: Aphididae) rūšys, aptinkamos antKnautiaL. genties augalų Baltarusijoje

Abstract: A morphological analysis of extensive material from Belarus (45 localities, 117 samples, 2002Belarus (45 localities, 117 samples, -2010 confirms that Macrosiphum silvaticum Meier, 1985 is a junior synonym of Macrosiphum knautiae Holman, 1972. Two species of the genus Macrosiphum were found on Knautia arvensis in Belarus in 2002-2010: M. rosae (Linnaeus, 1758), and M. knautiae Holman, 1972, the latter species being predominant. In addition to common key characters, a canonical discrimination function (Rakauska… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Lithuania the possible summer host plant of M. rosae, Knautia arvensis (LINNAEUS, 1753) COULTER, 1823, is mostly inhabited by another closely related species, M. knautiae HOLMAN, 1972(RAKAUSKAS 1985, 2003a. The same holds for Belarus (BUGA et al 2012). Molecular phylogenetic studies of the M. rosae species complex showed the above species to be different in their EF1α sequences, but nearly identical in their COI sequences (TURČINAVIČIENĖ & RAKAUSKAS 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In Lithuania the possible summer host plant of M. rosae, Knautia arvensis (LINNAEUS, 1753) COULTER, 1823, is mostly inhabited by another closely related species, M. knautiae HOLMAN, 1972(RAKAUSKAS 1985, 2003a. The same holds for Belarus (BUGA et al 2012). Molecular phylogenetic studies of the M. rosae species complex showed the above species to be different in their EF1α sequences, but nearly identical in their COI sequences (TURČINAVIČIENĖ & RAKAUSKAS 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%