2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/isbi.2019.8759147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

APCP-NET: Aggregated Parallel Cross-Scale Pyramid Network for CMR Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2019)). From this comparison, one can see that top algorithms are the ensemble method proposed by Isensee et al (2017) and the twostage method proposed by Li et al (2019a), both of which are based on FCNs. In particular, compared to the traditional level-set method (Tziritas and Grinias, 2017), both methods achieved considerably higher accuracy even for the more challenging segmentation of the left ventricular myocardium (Myo), indicating the power of deep learning based approaches.…”
Section: Ventricle Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2019)). From this comparison, one can see that top algorithms are the ensemble method proposed by Isensee et al (2017) and the twostage method proposed by Li et al (2019a), both of which are based on FCNs. In particular, compared to the traditional level-set method (Tziritas and Grinias, 2017), both methods achieved considerably higher accuracy even for the more challenging segmentation of the left ventricular myocardium (Myo), indicating the power of deep learning based approaches.…”
Section: Ventricle Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-stage networks: Recently, there is a growing interest in applying neural networks in a multi-stage pipeline which breaks down the segmentation problem into subtasks (Vigneault et al, 2018;Zheng et al, 2018;Li et al, 2019a;Tan et al, 2017;Liao et al, 2019). For example, Zheng et al (2018); Li et al (2019a) proposed a regionof-interest (ROI) localization network followed by a segmentation network.…”
Section: Ventricle Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since InlineVF is proprietary, we are unable to fully evaluate the mechanism by which such overestimations may occur, although approaches to modify or exclude inaccurate labels may further improve the performance of future models. Fourth, although higher pixel-wise agreement has been reported using previous deep learning approaches, 18,[27][28][29][30][31] we note that the majority of such models were trained using hand-labeled segmentations provided on standardized image sets, which may not be directly comparable to our UK Biobank test set images. Owing to absence of pretrained weights or incompatibility of older models with our codebase, we were unable to directly compare the performance of ML4H seg with previous models within our test set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…However, in the existing convolutional networks used for cardiac MRI segmentation, including U-Net, the skip connection between an encoder and a decoder path fuses features using the same resolution [20]. Therefore, these methods lack robustness, which has led to poor segmentation results and particularly ineffective segmentation of the RV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%