Abstract:Background. The purpose of this study was to analyze the risk of aortic events (death, dissection, or aortic rupture) associated with Marfan syndrome and decide on the optimal timing for preventive surgery on the aortic root.Methods. From January 2004 to June 2015, 397 patients from Marfan Units were studied by echocardiographic and computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of aorta and periodic annual monitoring. Mean follow-up was 5.6 ± 2.7 years. The annual incidence of aortic events was assessed a… Show more
“…3,4,10 However, the risk of aortic dissection increases when the aortic diameter is >5.0 cm and is greater in patients with a family history of aortic dissection or rapid aortic growth. 3,4,10…”
Aim:
The “2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease” provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).
Methods:
A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.
Structure:
Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.
“…3,4,10 However, the risk of aortic dissection increases when the aortic diameter is >5.0 cm and is greater in patients with a family history of aortic dissection or rapid aortic growth. 3,4,10…”
Aim:
The “2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease” provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).
Methods:
A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.
Structure:
Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.
“…Reconstructive surgery options are valve-sparing aortic root replacement or valved conduit aortic root replacement (Pepper et al, 2020). Indications for surgery are aortic diameter of more than 50 mm or more than 45 mm with concurrent risks and a growth rate of more than 5 mm/year (Goyal et al, 2017;Martín et al, 2020). However, research shows that not only the diameter is a predictor for the dissection and it should not be the sole indicator for intervention (Wenzel et al, 2021).…”
Diabetic subjects have higher prevalence as well as increased risk for coronary artery disease than non-diabetic counterparts. The study was aimed to seek the disparity of vessel diameters among diabetic and non-diabetic patients undergoing quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). The objectives were to compare coronary artery measurements (CAM) between diabetic and non-diabetic patients and also to find the respective segment of coronary artery affected greatest among diabetics by QCA. A cross sectional study was conducted in four cities of India after procuring the sanction for the same from the ethical committee of the pre-selected hospitals of four states in India. Informed consents were obtained. Post CABG, post PCI patients and patient being diabetic for ≥5 years were also excluded from the study. Among total sample population, non-flow lim-iting coronaries were seen in 1100(27.5%) cases [167 in NFL diabetic and 933 in NFL non-diabetic group]. We had 2890 (72.2%) patients with diseased coronaries. Ten segments of the coronary arteries were taken for diameter measurements namely, LMCA, LAD (O, P), DIAG, LCx (O, P), OM, RCA (O, P), RAM. These coronary diameters were indexed to body surface area (BSA) (mean diameter mm/m 2 BSA). For all arterial segments both indexed and non-indexed measurements of diabetic patients with NFL coronaries had significantly (p<0.01) smaller arterial segments except for RCA-o. Reduced dimensions after post balloon dilatations of PCI, diffused lesions can result in increased chances for in-stent restenosis among diabetics leading to poor outcome following PCI.
“…Patients with Marfan syndrome suf-fer from cardiovascular pathologies (Goyal et al, 2017;Grewal and Gittenberger-de Groot, 2018;Xuan et al, 2021). Aortic pathologies are reported in 90% of cases (Martín et al, 2020;Vanem et al, 2018). One of the forms of pathologies is the dilatation of the sinuses of Valsalva, which results in an aortic root aneurysm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reconstructive surgery options are valve-sparing aortic root replacement or valved conduit aortic root replacement (Pepper et al, 2020). Indications for surgery are aortic diameter of more than 50 mm or more than 45 mm with concurrent risks and a growth rate of more than 5 mm/year (Goyal et al, 2017;Martín et al, 2020). However, research shows that not only the diameter is a predictor for the dissection and it should not be the sole indicator for intervention (Wenzel et al, 2021).…”
Patients with Marfan syndrome and aortic root aneurysm require pre-surgical analysis of aortic root geometry for aortic reconstruction. The aim of this study is to perform the morphometric analysis of the sinus of Valsalva height and correlation between the former, age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), and body surface area (BSA) in patients with Marfan syndrome and aortic root aneurysm. Data from 34 patients (28 men, 6 women) with Marfan syndrome and an ascending aortic diameter exceeding 45 cm were obtained using computed tomography angiography. Gender-based differences were observed in the height of the left aortic sinus – by 47.23% (36.47±12.48 mm in men against 24.77±4.26 mm in women, р=0.0003). In men, a strong direct correlation has been identified between height and the right aortic sinus height (r=+0.75, р<0.0001), the posterior aortic sinus height (r=+0.71, р<0.0001), and the left aortic sinus height (r=+0.75, р<0.0001). Moderate reverse correlation has been discovered between the sinus of Valsalva height and BMI. No correlations have been identified between weight, BSA and the sinus of Valsalva height (р>0.05). In women, a strong direct correlation (Pearson) has been identified between age and the right aortic sinus height (r=+0.84, p=0.04), between weight and the left aortic sinus (r=+0.73, p=0.04) and between BSA and the left aortic sinus (r=+0.73, р=0.04). Aortic sinus height in men increases with height and decreases with higher BMI and age. Weight and BSA do not affect the sinus of Valsalva height. In women, the sinus of Valsalva height is impacted by age, weight and BSA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.