1996
DOI: 10.1016/0887-6185(96)00019-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anxiety sensitivity and menstrual cycle reactivity: Psychophysiological and self-report differences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
29
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
29
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings seem to suggest that the learning history origins of anxiety sensitivity may be solely rooted in experiences involving anxiety symptoms. The present finding may be reconciled with other studies that have noted the relationship between the anxiety sensitivity and other distressing conditions such as menstrual distress (Sigmon et al 1996), hypochondriasis (Watt and Stewart 2000), and back pain (Asmundson and Norton 1995). It is interesting to note that all the conditions mentioned have associations with anxiety.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Our findings seem to suggest that the learning history origins of anxiety sensitivity may be solely rooted in experiences involving anxiety symptoms. The present finding may be reconciled with other studies that have noted the relationship between the anxiety sensitivity and other distressing conditions such as menstrual distress (Sigmon et al 1996), hypochondriasis (Watt and Stewart 2000), and back pain (Asmundson and Norton 1995). It is interesting to note that all the conditions mentioned have associations with anxiety.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The data captured the frequency of skin conductance responses (defined as the number of peaks with amplitudes that were !.05 micromohs during the stimulus), a measure that other experiments with the same criterion have linked to levels of arousal (e.g., Kelsey, Ornduff, McCann, & Reiff, 2001;Sigmon, Fink, Rohan, & Hotovy, 1996;Sokhadze, 2007).…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, only one study has examined the role of AS physiological responding to anxiety-provoking stimuli during the premenstrual phase (Sigmon et al 1996). Specifically, the authors examined the interaction between AS (high vs. low) and menstrual phase [premenstrual (Days −5 to −1) vs. intermenstrual (Days 8-22)] on psychophysiological and psychological reactivity to anxiety-provoking stimuli (i.e., listening to descriptions of anxiety-provoking vs. neutral scenarios) using a cross-sectional design.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%